The central subject represents personal narratives detailing departures from a specific religious organization. These accounts typically explore the multifaceted reasons individuals disaffiliate from Calvary Chapel, a non-denominational evangelical church movement. An example would be an individual articulating their shifting theological perspectives or evolving personal values that led them to leave the fellowship.
Understanding the motivations behind these departures offers valuable insights into the complexities of faith, belief systems, and individual autonomy. Examining these experiences can illuminate potential areas of concern within religious institutions and contribute to broader discussions on religious freedom and personal spiritual journeys. The rise of internet forums and personal blogs has provided a platform for sharing these stories, fostering a community for those who have undergone similar experiences.
The following analysis will delve into common themes and recurring factors identified within these narratives, exploring theological disagreements, leadership concerns, and the impact of cultural and social changes on individual religious affiliations. This exploration aims to provide a balanced perspective on the dynamics at play when individuals choose to leave a religious community.
1. Theological disagreements
Theological disagreements constitute a significant catalyst in the departure from Calvary Chapel. Dissension from established doctrines and interpretations of scripture often forms the core of an individual’s decision to disaffiliate. This misalignment can stem from a deeper study of theological concepts, exposure to alternative viewpoints, or an evolving personal understanding of faith that conflicts with the church’s official stance. The impact of these disagreements can range from internal dissonance to open conflict with church leadership, ultimately leading to a sense of spiritual incongruity within the Calvary Chapel framework.
Examples of common theological disagreements include differing views on eschatology (the study of end times), the role of spiritual gifts, interpretations of biblical inerrancy, and the application of Old Testament law in contemporary Christian life. An individual, for instance, may develop a more nuanced understanding of grace and works, diverging from what they perceive as a legalistic emphasis within the church. This divergence can create tension, especially if the church leadership maintains a rigid adherence to specific interpretations and actively discourages alternative perspectives. The practical significance of understanding this lies in acknowledging the importance of intellectual integrity and the right to theological exploration within a faith community. A stifling of such exploration can inadvertently contribute to the erosion of faith and a subsequent departure.
In conclusion, theological disagreements represent a crucial element in the complex decision-making process of those leaving Calvary Chapel. Recognizing the validity of these intellectual and spiritual conflicts is essential for fostering constructive dialogue and understanding the diverse paths individuals take in their faith journeys. The challenge for religious organizations lies in balancing doctrinal consistency with the need to accommodate individual interpretations and provide a safe space for theological exploration. Ignoring these disagreements can lead to a loss of members and a weakening of the community’s intellectual and spiritual vitality.
2. Leadership Accountability
Leadership accountability within Calvary Chapel occupies a pivotal position in individual decisions to disaffiliate. The perceived integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct of church leaders significantly influence members’ trust and overall satisfaction. When leadership practices fail to meet expectations or perceived scriptural standards, it can contribute to disillusionment and ultimately prompt individuals to seek alternative spiritual communities.
-
Financial Transparency
The handling of church finances often comes under scrutiny. Members expect clear and consistent reporting of income, expenditures, and the allocation of resources. Perceived misuse of funds, lack of transparency in financial decision-making, or opulent lifestyles of leadership can erode trust. Instances of undisclosed salaries or questionable investment decisions can trigger concerns regarding stewardship and accountability, leading to departures from the church.
-
Ethical Conduct and Moral Standards
Leaders are held to a high standard of ethical conduct, both within the church and in their personal lives. Allegations of misconduct, abuse of power, or breaches of trust can severely damage the credibility of the leadership. When leaders are perceived to act inconsistently with the values they preach, it creates a sense of hypocrisy. Failure to address these issues adequately can further fuel disillusionment and push individuals to leave.
-
Decision-Making Processes
The methods by which decisions are made within the church can also impact member satisfaction. Opaque or autocratic decision-making processes can breed resentment and a sense of disempowerment. When major decisions are perceived as being made without proper consultation or input from the congregation, it can lead to feelings of alienation. A lack of transparency in how policies are formulated and implemented can also contribute to a perception of unaccountability.
-
Handling of Disputes and Grievances
The way leadership handles internal disputes and grievances plays a crucial role in maintaining trust. A fair and impartial process for addressing concerns is essential. Favoritism, bias, or a failure to adequately investigate allegations can undermine confidence in the leadership. When individuals feel their concerns are dismissed or ignored, it can lead to a sense of injustice and ultimately contribute to their decision to leave.
In conclusion, the facets of leadership accountability are interwoven into the narrative surrounding departures from Calvary Chapel. Instances of financial opacity, ethical lapses, autocratic decision-making, and mishandled grievances can culminate in a loss of trust and a sense of spiritual betrayal. Addressing these issues effectively requires a commitment to transparency, ethical conduct, inclusive governance, and a robust system for addressing concerns, all of which contribute to fostering a healthy and accountable church environment.
3. Doctrinal Rigidity
Doctrinal rigidity, characterized by an unyielding adherence to specific interpretations of scripture and theological principles, often contributes to individual decisions to leave Calvary Chapel. When a church prioritizes strict adherence to a pre-defined set of beliefs over individual interpretation and critical engagement with scripture, it can create an environment that stifles intellectual and spiritual growth. The pressure to conform to a specific theological viewpoint, even when it conflicts with personal conviction or evolving understanding, can lead to feelings of alienation and spiritual dissonance. This inflexibility can be a significant factor in the decision to disaffiliate.
The importance of doctrinal rigidity as a component stems from its impact on individual autonomy and the freedom to explore faith. For example, a member might develop nuanced perspectives on social issues or interpret biblical passages differently than the church leadership. If the church refuses to acknowledge or engage with these perspectives, it can foster a sense of intellectual and spiritual suffocation. Consider the case of individuals who question traditional interpretations of creationism or eschatology. If such inquiries are met with dismissal or condemnation, these individuals may feel compelled to leave in order to pursue their spiritual journey without constraint. The practical significance of understanding this dynamic lies in recognizing the importance of fostering intellectual humility and open dialogue within religious communities. Rigid adherence to doctrine without room for discussion can alienate members who seek a more nuanced and intellectually stimulating faith environment.
In conclusion, doctrinal rigidity is a pivotal element in the narratives of those leaving Calvary Chapel. It represents a tension between institutional authority and individual conscience. While doctrinal coherence is vital for maintaining a cohesive religious identity, an overly rigid approach can stifle intellectual exploration, alienate members with evolving beliefs, and ultimately contribute to the fragmentation of the community. Addressing this challenge requires religious organizations to find a balance between maintaining doctrinal integrity and fostering an environment that values critical thinking and individual spiritual growth.
4. Personal Experiences
Individual experiences within a religious institution, such as Calvary Chapel, serve as critical determinants in the decision to disaffiliate. These experiences, encompassing both positive and negative interactions, shape an individuals perception of the church and its alignment with their personal values and spiritual needs. Negative experiences, in particular, frequently factor into narratives explaining departures from the church.
-
Experiences with Church Leadership
Interactions with pastors, elders, and other church leaders can profoundly impact an individuals sense of belonging and spiritual well-being. Negative experiences, such as feeling judged, dismissed, or unheard by leadership, can contribute to disillusionment. Authoritarian leadership styles, perceived favoritism, or instances of mishandling personal information can also erode trust and foster a sense of alienation, subsequently influencing the decision to leave.
-
Community and Social Dynamics
The social environment within the church community significantly shapes an individual’s experience. Feelings of exclusion, social isolation, or experiences of being ostracized due to differing beliefs or lifestyles can lead to a sense of disconnect. Cliques, gossip, and a lack of genuine connection with other members can create an unwelcoming atmosphere. Conversely, positive social connections and supportive relationships within the church can mitigate the impact of other negative experiences, influencing an individual’s decision to remain.
-
Experiences of Spiritual Growth or Stagnation
Personal experiences related to spiritual growth or stagnation also contribute to decisions regarding church affiliation. If an individual feels that their spiritual needs are not being met, that they are not growing in their faith, or that the church’s teachings are hindering their spiritual development, they may seek alternative spiritual communities. Instances of feeling pressured to conform to specific spiritual practices or experiencing a lack of intellectual stimulation can further contribute to this sense of stagnation.
-
Encounters with Hypocrisy or Inauthenticity
Witnessing perceived hypocrisy or inauthenticity within the church community or among its leadership can significantly impact an individual’s faith and trust. Observing discrepancies between the teachings of the church and the actions of its members, particularly leaders, can lead to disillusionment and a questioning of the church’s integrity. This misalignment between stated beliefs and actual behavior can erode confidence and ultimately influence the decision to leave.
These multifaceted personal experiences collectively shape an individual’s overall perception of Calvary Chapel and its suitability as their spiritual home. While theological disagreements and doctrinal rigidity may provide intellectual reasons for leaving, personal experiences often serve as the emotional and relational catalysts that ultimately drive the decision. Examining these experiences provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics influencing individual choices regarding religious affiliation.
5. Evolving Beliefs
Evolving beliefs, representing shifts in an individual’s theological understanding and personal values, frequently contribute to the decision to disaffiliate from Calvary Chapel. These shifts often stem from further study, life experiences, or exposure to different perspectives, creating a divergence between an individual’s convictions and the church’s established doctrines.
-
Reinterpretation of Scripture
An individual’s evolving beliefs may involve reinterpreting specific biblical passages or doctrines in light of new information or experiences. For instance, a person may adopt a more nuanced view on issues such as creationism, eschatology, or the role of women in ministry, diverging from the church’s traditional interpretations. This reinterpretation can lead to conflict with the church’s leadership and community, contributing to a sense of spiritual isolation and ultimately leading to departure.
-
Shifting Social Values
Evolving beliefs often encompass changes in an individual’s social values, particularly on issues such as LGBTQ+ rights, racial justice, and environmental stewardship. If these evolving values clash with the church’s stance on these issues, it can create significant tension. An individual may find themselves increasingly uncomfortable with the church’s teachings or actions, leading to a sense of moral dissonance and prompting them to seek a more inclusive and socially conscious community.
-
Changing Understanding of God
An individual’s understanding of God may also evolve over time, influenced by personal experiences, philosophical inquiry, or exposure to different theological perspectives. This evolving understanding can lead to a questioning of traditional doctrines regarding God’s nature, attributes, and relationship with humanity. If the church is unwilling to accommodate these evolving perspectives, it can create a sense of spiritual alienation and contribute to the decision to leave.
-
Personal Spiritual Growth
Evolving beliefs may be a natural consequence of personal spiritual growth and maturation. As individuals mature in their faith, they may develop a deeper understanding of themselves, their relationship with God, and their place in the world. This spiritual growth can lead to a questioning of previously held beliefs and a desire for a more authentic and meaningful spiritual experience. If the church is unable to provide a space for this growth, it can hinder an individual’s spiritual journey and prompt them to seek alternative avenues for spiritual development.
In conclusion, evolving beliefs serve as a significant factor in the complex decision-making process of those leaving Calvary Chapel. These shifts in theological understanding and personal values often create a dissonance between an individual’s convictions and the church’s established doctrines, leading to a sense of spiritual isolation and prompting them to seek a more congruent and authentic spiritual community. The acknowledgement of this facet is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the motivations behind disaffiliation.
6. Social Issues
The divergence between an individual’s evolving perspectives on social issues and the established stances of Calvary Chapel frequently contributes to decisions to disaffiliate. Discrepancies between personal convictions and the church’s teachings on contemporary social matters can create a sense of moral conflict, prompting individuals to seek alternative spiritual communities aligned with their values.
-
LGBTQ+ Inclusion
Differing views on the acceptance and inclusion of LGBTQ+ individuals often represent a significant point of contention. Calvary Chapel’s traditional stance on marriage and sexuality may clash with evolving societal attitudes and an individual’s personal belief in equality and acceptance. Experiencing discrimination or feeling pressured to condemn LGBTQ+ individuals can lead to disillusionment and a desire to join a more affirming community. The perceived lack of compassion and understanding can be a catalyst for departure.
-
Racial Justice
Perspectives on racial justice and equality can also contribute to disaffiliation. If an individual believes the church is not actively addressing systemic racism or promoting racial reconciliation, it can create a sense of moral unease. A failure to acknowledge or address racial injustices within the church community or society at large can lead to feelings of frustration and a desire for a more socially conscious and engaged spiritual environment. A lack of diversity in leadership and membership can exacerbate these concerns.
-
Political Engagement
The level and nature of political engagement within the church can also influence an individual’s decision to leave. If the church is perceived as overly aligned with a particular political ideology or party, it can alienate members with differing political views. A perceived conflation of religious beliefs with political agendas can create a sense of discomfort and a desire for a more politically neutral spiritual community. The tone and content of political discussions within the church can also be a factor.
-
Environmental Stewardship
Attitudes towards environmental stewardship and climate change can also contribute to disagreements. If an individual believes the church is not taking sufficient action to protect the environment or address climate change, it can create a sense of moral conflict. A perceived lack of concern for environmental issues can lead to feelings of dissonance and a desire for a spiritual community that prioritizes environmental responsibility. This can be particularly relevant for younger members who prioritize environmental activism.
The aforementioned social issues reflect areas where individual beliefs and evolving societal norms frequently intersect with religious teachings. Discrepancies in these areas often trigger critical re-evaluations of an individual’s alignment with Calvary Chapel’s values. The perceived response, or lack thereof, to these issues can ultimately impact decisions regarding continued affiliation. These points highlight the importance of religious organizations addressing evolving social issues with thoughtfulness and sensitivity to meet the spiritual and ethical needs of their congregants.
7. Community disconnect
Community disconnect, characterized by feelings of isolation, exclusion, or a lack of genuine connection within a religious community, often serves as a significant precursor to disaffiliation from Calvary Chapel. The absence of strong social bonds, shared values, and a supportive network can erode an individual’s sense of belonging, prompting them to question their continued involvement. This disconnect can stem from various factors, including shifting demographics, differing levels of engagement, or experiences of judgment and exclusion. When individuals no longer feel a strong sense of connection or shared purpose with their fellow congregants, the likelihood of departure increases substantially. The importance of community within religious institutions cannot be overstated; it provides emotional support, fosters spiritual growth, and reinforces shared beliefs. Its absence therefore becomes a powerful motivator for seeking alternative spiritual communities.
Several factors contribute to the erosion of community within a church setting. Organizational growth can lead to impersonal interactions and a diminished sense of intimacy. Changes in church leadership or doctrinal emphasis can disrupt established relationships and create divisions within the congregation. Furthermore, differing expectations regarding social engagement, volunteer involvement, or adherence to specific lifestyle choices can result in exclusion and a sense of not fitting in. For instance, an individual who holds more progressive social views may feel marginalized within a traditionally conservative church community. Similarly, those facing personal challenges such as divorce or financial hardship may encounter judgment or a lack of support from fellow members. These experiences highlight the critical role of inclusivity and empathy in fostering a strong and resilient community. When a church fails to prioritize these qualities, it risks alienating its members and contributing to a broader sense of disconnect.
In conclusion, community disconnect is a critical element in understanding the factors that contribute to departures from Calvary Chapel. The absence of meaningful connections, supportive relationships, and a shared sense of belonging can erode an individual’s commitment to the church and ultimately lead to disaffiliation. Recognizing the importance of community and actively working to foster inclusivity, empathy, and genuine connection are essential for religious organizations seeking to retain their members and create a thriving spiritual environment. Addressing this challenge requires a proactive effort to build bridges, promote understanding, and ensure that all members feel valued and supported.
8. Spiritual Growth
Spiritual growth, or its perceived absence, frequently contributes to the decision to leave Calvary Chapel. Individuals embark on spiritual journeys with expectations of deepening their understanding of faith, experiencing personal transformation, and developing a closer relationship with the divine. When these expectations are unmet or when the church environment appears to hinder rather than foster such growth, individuals may seek alternative spiritual communities. The absence of intellectual stimulation, limitations on exploring diverse theological perspectives, or a perceived stagnation in personal spiritual development can all serve as catalysts for disaffiliation. This dynamic highlights the importance of individual spiritual progress in the context of religious affiliation. For example, an individual may initially embrace the teachings of Calvary Chapel but later develop a desire for more contemplative practices or a deeper engagement with social justice issues. If the church is perceived as resistant to these evolving spiritual needs, the individual may feel compelled to seek a more supportive and challenging environment.
Furthermore, the concept of spiritual growth can encompass an expanding awareness of personal values and a desire for authenticity. If an individual begins to recognize discrepancies between the church’s stated values and its actual practices, it can lead to a sense of disillusionment and a questioning of their continued involvement. Consider the case of someone who witnesses judgmental attitudes towards individuals with different lifestyles or observes a lack of compassion towards those struggling with personal challenges. Such experiences can create a moral conflict and prompt a reevaluation of the church’s suitability as a vehicle for personal spiritual development. In practical terms, this understanding underscores the need for religious institutions to cultivate an environment that encourages intellectual curiosity, promotes critical self-reflection, and supports diverse expressions of faith. A rigid adherence to tradition or a reluctance to engage with contemporary issues can inadvertently impede the spiritual growth of its members and contribute to their departure.
In summary, the perception of spiritual stagnation or the active hindrance of personal spiritual growth constitutes a significant factor in the narratives of those who leave Calvary Chapel. The desire for intellectual stimulation, authentic community, and a deeper connection with the divine motivates individuals to seek environments where their spiritual needs are better met. Religious organizations that prioritize fostering intellectual curiosity, promoting inclusivity, and supporting individual spiritual journeys are more likely to retain their members and contribute to their overall well-being. Addressing this challenge requires a commitment to creating a dynamic and evolving spiritual environment that embraces diversity and encourages lifelong learning.
9. Hypocrisy Observed
The observation of hypocrisy within a religious organization significantly impacts individual decisions to disaffiliate. Instances where professed beliefs and ethical standards seemingly conflict with the actual behaviors of members, especially leaders, can erode trust and prompt departures from Calvary Chapel.
-
Discrepancies in Financial Practices
Inconsistencies between teachings on stewardship and the actual financial practices of the church or its leaders can constitute a form of hypocrisy. Examples include lavish spending on non-essential items, lack of transparency in financial reporting, or perceived misuse of funds. Such actions contradict the message of humility and responsible resource management often preached within the church. When members observe these discrepancies, it can lead to questions about the integrity and trustworthiness of the leadership and the organization as a whole.
-
Incongruence in Moral Conduct
When members or leaders fail to uphold the moral standards promoted by the church, it creates a sense of hypocrisy. Examples could be engaging in extramarital affairs, substance abuse, or dishonesty in business dealings. Such incongruence between professed values and actual behavior undermines the credibility of the church’s moral authority and can lead to disillusionment among the congregants. The impact is particularly significant when leaders, who are expected to be moral exemplars, are involved.
-
Selective Application of Doctrine
The selective application of religious doctrines and rules, where certain individuals or groups are treated differently or exempted from standards applied to others, can be perceived as hypocrisy. For instance, overlooking the transgressions of influential members while strictly enforcing rules on others generates inequality and undermines the perceived fairness of the religious community. This can lead to feelings of alienation and a sense that the church is not living up to its own professed values.
-
Lack of Compassion and Forgiveness
A perceived lack of compassion and forgiveness within the church, particularly towards those who have made mistakes or are struggling with personal challenges, can constitute hypocrisy. When the church community or its leaders are quick to judge and condemn rather than offer support and understanding, it contradicts the message of grace and redemption. This can lead to feelings of rejection and a sense that the church is not a safe or loving environment.
The combined effect of observed hypocrisy across these facets contributes significantly to the decision to leave Calvary Chapel. When members perceive a disconnect between the church’s stated values and its actual practices, it erodes trust and undermines the sense of community and shared purpose. This can lead to a questioning of the church’s authenticity and a desire to seek a more genuine and consistent spiritual environment. The impact of such observations highlights the critical importance of integrity and transparency within religious organizations.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following addresses common inquiries surrounding the decision to leave Calvary Chapel, providing objective insights into recurring themes and perspectives.
Question 1: What are the primary reasons individuals cite for leaving Calvary Chapel?
Common reasons encompass theological disagreements, perceived lack of leadership accountability, doctrinal rigidity, personal experiences within the church, evolving personal beliefs, concerns regarding social issues, feelings of community disconnect, a perceived lack of spiritual growth opportunities, and instances of observed hypocrisy.
Question 2: How do theological disagreements contribute to decisions to leave?
Differing interpretations of scripture, theological doctrines, and core beliefs frequently trigger internal conflict and dissatisfaction. When an individual’s theological understanding diverges significantly from the church’s established doctrines, it can create a sense of spiritual incongruity and lead to disaffiliation.
Question 3: In what ways does leadership accountability impact decisions to leave Calvary Chapel?
Perceived lack of transparency, ethical lapses, autocratic decision-making, and mishandling of grievances by church leaders can erode trust among members. Concerns regarding financial stewardship, ethical conduct, and equitable treatment can contribute to disillusionment and prompt individuals to seek alternative spiritual communities.
Question 4: How does doctrinal rigidity factor into the decision to disaffiliate?
An unyielding adherence to specific interpretations of scripture and theological principles can stifle intellectual exploration and personal spiritual growth. When the church prioritizes doctrinal conformity over individual interpretation, it can create an environment that alienates members seeking a more nuanced and intellectually stimulating faith experience.
Question 5: What role do personal experiences play in the decision to leave Calvary Chapel?
Interactions with church leadership, experiences within the community, instances of spiritual growth or stagnation, and observations of perceived hypocrisy all contribute to an individual’s overall perception of the church. Negative experiences, such as feeling judged, excluded, or unheard, can significantly influence the decision to disaffiliate.
Question 6: How do evolving social values and perspectives contribute to decisions to leave?
Shifting viewpoints on social issues, such as LGBTQ+ inclusion, racial justice, and political engagement, can create tension between an individual’s convictions and the church’s stance on these matters. When the church’s teachings or actions clash with an individual’s evolving social values, it can lead to moral conflict and a desire for a more aligned spiritual community.
These FAQs provide a foundational understanding of the multifaceted reasons behind disaffiliation from Calvary Chapel. It is important to recognize the diverse factors influencing these decisions.
This information will serve as the basis for our conclusion.
Navigating a Departure
Individuals contemplating or undergoing disaffiliation from Calvary Chapel should carefully consider several key aspects to ensure a smooth and thoughtful transition. These considerations encompass emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions.
Tip 1: Engage in Thorough Self-Reflection: Before making a final decision, carefully examine the reasons for considering departure. Evaluate whether these reasons stem from temporary frustrations or fundamental differences in belief, values, or spiritual needs. Maintain a journal to track evolving thoughts and feelings.
Tip 2: Seek Counsel from Trusted Individuals: Consult with trusted friends, family members, or professional counselors who can provide objective perspectives and support. Prioritize counsel from individuals who understand the complexities of faith transitions and can offer guidance without imposing their own beliefs.
Tip 3: Research Alternative Spiritual Communities: Explore other religious or spiritual communities that align with evolving beliefs and values. Attend services, participate in community events, and engage in conversations with members to assess whether a new community offers a suitable environment for spiritual growth and connection.
Tip 4: Communicate Respectfully and Clearly: If a decision to leave is made, communicate this decision respectfully and clearly to church leadership and close friends within the congregation. Avoid accusatory language and focus on articulating personal reasons for disaffiliation. Maintain professionalism.
Tip 5: Establish a Support System: Leaving a long-standing religious community can lead to feelings of isolation and loss. Actively cultivate a support system consisting of friends, family members, or support groups who can provide emotional support during the transition. Consider seeking therapy to process complex emotions.
Tip 6: Allow Time for Processing: Acknowledge that transitioning out of a religious community is a process that requires time and patience. Allow space for processing emotions, adjusting to new routines, and redefining one’s spiritual identity. Practice self-care and avoid rushing into new commitments.
Tip 7: Define Personal Boundaries: Clearly define personal boundaries with former members of Calvary Chapel to manage expectations and protect emotional well-being. Establish limits on communication and involvement in church-related activities to facilitate a healthy transition.
These tips offer guidance through a significant life change. Individuals departing from Calvary Chapel can prioritize their emotional and spiritual well-being.
These considerations now inform the concluding statements of this article.
Conclusion
This exploration has illuminated the complex and multifaceted reasons underpinning departures from Calvary Chapel. Factors such as theological disagreements, leadership accountability concerns, doctrinal rigidity, personal experiences, evolving beliefs, social issues, community disconnect, perceived hindrances to spiritual growth, and observed hypocrisy frequently intertwine, contributing to individual decisions to disaffiliate. These narratives highlight the importance of personal spiritual journeys, ethical leadership, and the need for inclusive and intellectually stimulating religious environments.
The narratives surrounding why i left calvary chapel underscore the broader significance of religious freedom and individual autonomy. Understanding these motivations offers valuable insights for religious organizations seeking to foster healthy and sustainable communities, and reinforces the ongoing need for open dialogue and critical self-reflection within faith-based institutions. It encourages continuous pursuit for the church and also encourage members in the church.
