The subject of this inquiry focuses on the establishment date of a prominent sports venue. The precise timeframe of its completion is essential for understanding its place in the history of both the organization that utilizes it and the surrounding community.
Knowing the construction timeline allows for placing events and milestones within a proper historical context. It provides insights into the planning, design, and engineering principles prevalent during the period of its creation. Furthermore, understanding the reasons behind the construction and the subsequent impact on the local economy and fanbase is significant.
Therefore, the following information will detail the specific year and related circumstances surrounding the opening of the stadium in question, along with relevant facts about its construction and initial reception.
1. Construction Start
The commencement of construction in 2006 is a foundational element when addressing the question of the stadium’s establishment. It represents the initial phase of a multi-year project culminating in its opening. This starting point dictates the subsequent timeline and directly relates to its overall history.
-
Planning and Design Completion
The year 2006 followed a period of extensive planning and architectural design. Finalizing these plans was a prerequisite for initiating physical construction. This preliminary stage determined the stadium’s structural features, capacity, and aesthetic considerations. Without completed designs, the construction phase could not have commenced in 2006, thus affecting the definitive answer regarding the stadium’s completion.
-
Site Preparation and Groundbreaking
Starting construction required significant site preparation, including demolition of existing structures and ground leveling. Groundbreaking ceremonies marked the official beginning of the project, signaling a transition from planning to execution. This crucial step in 2006 set the precedent for all subsequent construction activities, embedding it as a critical element to the stadium’s eventual completion.
-
Resource Allocation and Procurement
The year of construction commencement also entailed the allocation of substantial financial and material resources. Procuring necessary construction materials, securing labor contracts, and establishing logistical infrastructure were essential for sustained progress. The effective management of these resources from 2006 onward directly impacted the timeline, quality, and final cost of the stadium, thus influencing when it was ultimately built.
-
Weather Impact and Initial Foundation Work
The weather conditions encountered throughout 2006 significantly affected the pace of construction. Harsh weather could delay the initial foundation work, impacting the overall project schedule. Initial foundation laying provides the base which needs to be worked, and any delay on foundation work would delay the opening of the stadium.
In summary, the construction start date of 2006 serves as the pivotal beginning from which the stadiums realization unfolded. The planning, site preparation, resource allocation, and initial construction activities undertaken during that year were integral to the overall process, inextricably linking it to the stadiums ultimate completion and establishing its place in the sporting landscape.
2. Completion Year
The year 2009 marks the culmination of the construction phase, providing a definitive answer to when the sports venue was finalized. This date signifies the end of the building process and the commencement of its operational lifespan, serving as a crucial milestone in its history.
-
Architectural and Engineering Sign-Off
The stadium’s completion in 2009 signifies that all architectural and engineering standards were met and approved. This included final inspections to ensure structural integrity, safety compliance, and adherence to design specifications. Any delays or failures to meet these criteria would have postponed the completion date, emphasizing its importance in determining the venue’s establishment.
-
Infrastructure and Amenity Installation
The installation of all necessary infrastructure and amenities reached completion in 2009. This encompasses elements such as seating, lighting, concessions, restroom facilities, and technology infrastructure (e.g., scoreboards, sound systems). These were essential to the stadium’s functionality. The coordination and execution of these installations contribute directly to the significance of the completion year.
-
Regulatory Compliance and Permitting
Final regulatory compliance and the acquisition of necessary operational permits occurred in 2009. Governmental bodies must approve the stadium for public use, confirming adherence to safety codes, accessibility standards, and environmental regulations. Securing these approvals was essential to the stadiums opening, thus solidifying 2009 as a critical year.
-
Transition to Operational Readiness
The stadium’s completion in 2009 signals its transition to operational readiness. This phase involves staff training, logistical planning, and preparation for hosting events. The successful completion of these activities was necessary before the stadium could be opened to the public, linking it inextricably to its official completion year.
In summary, the completion year of 2009 signifies more than just the end of construction; it embodies the successful culmination of architectural design, engineering, infrastructure, regulatory compliance, and operational readiness. This culmination answers the core question by highlighting the date when the stadium was fully prepared for its intended purpose, establishing its place in the sporting landscape and community.
3. Opening Date
The opening date of March 29, 2009, is intrinsically linked to the question of when the stadium was built. It represents the tangible result of the entire construction process, serving as the publicly recognized marker of its completion. Without this specific date, the query would remain incomplete, lacking the crucial element of operational commencement. The selection of this date, though seemingly arbitrary, followed extensive planning, inspection, and logistical arrangements to ensure the venue was ready for public use. This date is thus more than just a calendar point; it symbolizes the culmination of years of design, planning, and construction efforts.
The opening date also carries practical significance. It allows for the accurate chronological placement of events that have occurred at the stadium. For example, knowing the stadium opened on March 29, 2009, enables historians, sports analysts, and fans to precisely trace the milestones, games, and cultural moments that have unfolded within its walls. This date also serves as a reference point for assessing the facility’s lifespan, evaluating its performance, and planning for future renovations or upgrades. Furthermore, merchandise, commemorative items, and marketing campaigns often reference this date, imbuing it with economic and cultural relevance.
In essence, the opening date of March 29, 2009, functions as the definitive answer to the question of when the stadium was built. It encapsulates the entire construction process, provides a temporal marker for subsequent events, and contributes to the stadium’s economic and cultural significance. Therefore, understanding its importance is essential for anyone seeking a comprehensive understanding of the stadium’s history and place within the larger sporting landscape.
4. Shea Stadium Replacement
The designation “Shea Stadium Replacement” holds fundamental importance when considering the date of Citi Field’s establishment. This descriptor signifies not merely a new construction project but a transition, indicating a direct lineage and purpose for the new venue. Understanding this relationship provides critical context for determining when Citi Field was built.
-
Necessity and Justification
The aging condition and infrastructural limitations of Shea Stadium necessitated the construction of a new facility. Decades of use had rendered Shea Stadium less suitable for contemporary sporting events and fan experiences. The decision to build Citi Field was directly tied to the inadequacy of its predecessor. Therefore, Shea Stadium’s obsolescence is an underlying reason determining the timeline of Citi Field’s construction; the “when” is inextricably linked to the “why” of replacing Shea.
-
Timeline Overlap and Transition
The construction timeline of Citi Field was intentionally coordinated with the final years of Shea Stadium’s operation. There was a period of overlap where both stadiums existed, with Shea Stadium hosting games until the completion of its replacement. This transitional phase reflects careful planning to ensure continuity for the team and its fanbase. The “when” of Citi Field’s construction, therefore, aligns with the concluding period of Shea Stadium’s active service.
-
Design and Symbolic Continuity
While Citi Field represented a modern upgrade, design elements were incorporated to maintain symbolic links to Shea Stadium and the team’s history. Features like the Home Run Apple and certain architectural motifs served as nods to the past, preserving a sense of continuity. The “when” of Citi Field is, in part, defined by a conscious effort to bridge the old and the new, influencing design decisions and construction priorities.
-
Location and Community Impact
Citi Field was constructed in close proximity to Shea Stadium, ensuring minimal disruption to the team’s established location within Queens. This decision reflected a commitment to maintaining the team’s presence within the local community. Thus, the “when” of Citi Field’s construction is connected to the strategic choice of location, intended to minimize displacement and retain the existing fanbase within the same geographical area.
In conclusion, the phrase “Shea Stadium Replacement” is not merely a label but an integral part of understanding the stadium’s origin. The need for a replacement, the transitional timeline, design continuities, and location considerations all underscore the inherent relationship between the two venues. These elements directly impact the significance of its construction year, providing a deeper understanding of its history and purpose.
5. Architecture
The architectural firm HOK Sport’s involvement is an inseparable element in determining the definitive construction timeline. HOK Sport’s design directly influenced the planning, phases, and ultimately, the timing of the stadium’s completion. As the lead architect, HOK Sport was responsible for translating conceptual visions into actionable blueprints, a process that dictated the overall project schedule. The firm’s expertise in stadium design, including its ability to manage complex structural and aesthetic considerations, played a critical role in adhering to the 2006-2009 construction timeline. Any delays or alterations in their design proposals would have inevitably impacted the completion date. Furthermore, their coordination with engineers, contractors, and other stakeholders was paramount in ensuring efficient construction progress. Real-world examples of HOK Sport’s impact include their innovative design solutions to address spatial challenges, which mitigated potential delays and contributed to meeting the project’s targeted completion date. A failure to meet all design expectations may have delayed the project completion date.
The architectural design also dictated the selection and procurement of building materials, impacting logistical timelines. HOK Sport specified materials that met aesthetic requirements and adhered to safety and durability standards. The lead time for procuring these materials factored into the overall construction schedule. Therefore, the firm’s material choices directly influenced the project’s critical path and, consequently, the final construction date. Moreover, the architectural design impacted the construction methods employed. Complex architectural features required specialized construction techniques and skilled labor, which in turn, affected the time required for completion. For instance, the design of the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, a signature architectural element, required meticulous craftsmanship and precise execution, influencing the scheduling of construction activities. The firm’s expertise made it possible for completion to be on the date it was due.
In summary, HOK Sport’s architectural role was more than aesthetic; it was integral to the timeline of the venues realization. Their design decisions dictated construction phases, material procurement, and specialized techniques, each with a direct impact on the completion date. Challenges in the architectural design phase could have easily extended the construction timeline. The successful navigation of these challenges contributed significantly to meeting the stadium’s construction goal, inextricably linking HOK Sport’s work to the definitive answer regarding the stadium’s completion.
6. Location
The selection of Queens, New York, as the venue’s location is intrinsically connected to the timeline of its establishment. The geographic context influenced construction logistics, regulatory processes, and community integration, all of which played a role in determining the commencement and completion dates. The pre-existing infrastructure, availability of land, and local labor market within Queens directly impacted the feasibility and scheduling of the project. For instance, access to transportation networks and the existing utility grid facilitated the efficient movement of materials and resources, potentially accelerating the construction timeline compared to a more remote location.
Furthermore, the decision to remain in Queens stemmed from a desire to maintain continuity with the existing fanbase and preserve the team’s historical ties to the borough. This commitment necessitated navigating local zoning regulations, engaging with community stakeholders, and addressing potential environmental concerns, processes that introduced complexities and potential delays. An example is the environmental impact assessments required due to the proximity to Flushing Meadows Corona Park. These factors, originating from the location choice, became integral components of the overall project timeline and influenced the ultimate completion date.
In summary, the location in Queens, New York, was not merely a geographic designation but a crucial determinant in the timeline of the stadium’s construction. The practical considerations related to infrastructure, regulations, community engagement, and environmental factors, all stemming from the location, played a pivotal role in shaping the project’s trajectory and ultimately influencing the date it was built. Understanding this connection provides essential context for comprehending the complexities of the stadium’s origin and its place within the urban landscape.
7. Cost
The expenditure of approximately $850 million on the stadium project is inextricably linked to its construction timeline. This significant financial investment dictated the scope, speed, and ultimately, the completion date. The availability of capital allowed for the procurement of necessary materials, the employment of skilled labor, and the implementation of advanced construction techniques. Without this substantial funding, the project’s scale would have been curtailed, potentially leading to delays or a protracted construction schedule. For example, securing a reliable supply chain for steel and concrete, essential components of the structure, necessitated significant financial resources. Any shortfall in funding could have disrupted this supply chain, causing work stoppages and impacting the completion date.
Furthermore, the allocation of $850 million influenced the project’s ability to adhere to regulatory requirements and mitigate potential environmental challenges. Compliance with building codes, safety standards, and environmental regulations requires substantial investment in planning, monitoring, and remediation. Failure to allocate sufficient funds for these aspects could have resulted in legal challenges, regulatory delays, and project shutdowns, all of which would have impacted the completion date. For example, managing storm water runoff during construction required implementing sophisticated drainage systems, a cost that was factored into the overall budget. Insufficient funding for environmental controls could have triggered regulatory scrutiny and construction delays.
In summary, the $850 million price tag was not merely a financial figure but a critical factor shaping the stadium’s construction timeline. The availability of this substantial funding level facilitated efficient construction practices, regulatory compliance, and environmental management, all of which contributed to meeting the targeted completion date. Conversely, any financial constraints could have led to delays, cost overruns, and potential project disruptions. Therefore, understanding the expenditure is essential for comprehending the factors that influenced precisely when the stadium was built and opened.
8. First Game
The inaugural game held on April 13, 2009, is a pivotal event defining the stadium’s timeline. It marks the transition from construction to operational use, solidifying the answer to the question of its completion.
-
Culmination of Construction and Readiness Verification
The date of the first game represents the tangible culmination of construction efforts. Prior to this date, meticulous inspections and readiness assessments were conducted to ensure the facility met all operational standards. The successful execution of this event verified the stadium’s readiness for public use, thus validating its construction timeline. Absent this validation, the question of “when” it was truly built would remain ambiguous.
-
Public Inauguration and Symbolic Launch
The first game served as the official public inauguration of the venue. It was a symbolic launch that transcended mere sporting activity, representing the culmination of years of planning, design, and construction. This event provided the initial opportunity for public assessment, setting the tone for subsequent usage. The significance of this event is thus inseparable from the overall understanding of the stadium’s origin and its place in the community.
-
Operational Logistics and Event Management Validation
The execution of the inaugural game provided a real-world validation of the operational logistics and event management infrastructure. This included aspects such as ticketing, security, concessions, transportation, and crowd control. The success of these operations demonstrated the stadium’s preparedness for handling large-scale events, underscoring its functional completion. Therefore, the smooth execution of the first game substantiates the completion date.
-
Economic and Social Impact Inauguration
The first game marked the formal commencement of the stadium’s economic and social impact on the surrounding community. The event generated revenue for local businesses, created employment opportunities, and fostered community pride. This inaugural impact is intrinsically linked to the stadium’s intended purpose and contributes to understanding the value and influence of the project upon its completion.
In summary, the first game on April 13, 2009, serves as a definitive marker in the stadium’s timeline. It encapsulates the successful completion of construction, public inauguration, operational validation, and commencement of economic and social impact. This event, therefore, is inextricably linked to the answer to “when”, solidifying its place in the stadium’s history and purpose.
9. Honoring Jackie Robinson
The design incorporated elements dedicated to Jackie Robinson, signifying a tangible commitment to his legacy. The inclusion of the Jackie Robinson Rotunda at the stadium’s main entrance serves as a prominent example. This feature, conceived during the stadium’s planning phases, underscores the historical and cultural importance of Robinson’s contributions to baseball and American society. The selection of this specific tribute, and its prominent placement, became an integral part of the stadium’s identity from its inception. Therefore, “Honoring Jackie Robinson” was not merely an afterthought but a planned component influencing design and aesthetic choices during the period “when Citi Field was built.” The commitment to this element required specific design considerations, material selection, and artistic execution, factoring into the overall project timeline and budget.
The implementation of the Jackie Robinson Rotunda involved collaboration with historians, designers, and the Robinson family to ensure accuracy and authenticity. This collaborative process extended beyond the construction phase, requiring ongoing maintenance and preservation efforts. Furthermore, the stadium’s location in New York City, where Robinson played for the Brooklyn Dodgers, further emphasized the significance of honoring his legacy at the site. The decision to prioritize this tribute reflected an intention to connect the new stadium with the historical roots of baseball within the city. Thus, “Honoring Jackie Robinson” influenced key decisions during the construction process, including resource allocation and timeline considerations.
In summary, the dedication to “Honoring Jackie Robinson” was not merely a symbolic gesture but an integrated component of the stadium’s design and construction. The planning, design, and implementation of the Jackie Robinson Rotunda influenced project timelines, resource allocation, and aesthetic choices. The incorporation of this element reflects a conscious effort to embed historical awareness into the stadium’s structure from its inception, inextricably linking its construction timeline with the tribute to Robinson’s enduring legacy.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following addresses common inquiries regarding the construction period of Citi Field, providing specific details and contextual information.
Question 1: What were the primary reasons for constructing Citi Field?
Citi Field was built to replace Shea Stadium, which had become outdated and structurally inadequate. The new stadium aimed to provide improved facilities, enhanced fan experiences, and a more modern venue for baseball.
Question 2: How long did the construction of Citi Field take?
Construction commenced in 2006 and concluded in 2009, spanning approximately three years. This timeframe encompassed demolition of existing structures, site preparation, foundation work, and the erection of the new stadium.
Question 3: What was the total cost associated with the construction?
The total cost is estimated to be approximately $850 million. This figure includes design, materials, labor, and infrastructure development.
Question 4: Who was the lead architectural firm responsible for the stadium’s design?
HOK Sport, a firm specializing in sports venue design, served as the lead architect. Their design incorporated both modern features and symbolic nods to baseball history.
Question 5: What are some key architectural features of the new stadium?
Key architectural features include the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, an iconic entrance honoring the baseball legend, and various design elements reflecting classic baseball parks. These features enhance the overall aesthetic appeal and historical significance.
Question 6: Did the construction process encounter any significant challenges or delays?
While specific details of every challenge are not widely publicized, large-scale construction projects invariably encounter logistical and environmental hurdles. The project navigated regulatory requirements and environmental impact assessments to ensure timely completion.
In summary, the construction was a multi-year undertaking motivated by the need for an updated facility, with the completion date reflecting the successful navigation of the many challenges associated with such a large-scale project.
The following section will provide sources where additional information can be found.
Insights into the Timeline
The following are key points to consider when examining the question of Citi Field’s construction timeline.
Tip 1: Understand the Pre-Construction Phase: Research the planning and design stages preceding the physical construction. This phase includes architectural design finalization, site selection, and securing necessary permits. Delays or alterations during this phase can directly impact the overall project timeline.
Tip 2: Identify Key Stakeholders: Determine the primary entities involved in the construction process. These include the architectural firm (HOK Sport), construction companies, and government regulatory bodies. Their roles and coordination influence project efficiency and timelines.
Tip 3: Analyze Cost Factors: Investigate the financial aspects of the project. The availability of funding, cost management strategies, and unforeseen expenses can all affect the construction schedule.
Tip 4: Consider Environmental and Regulatory Compliance: Assess the impact of environmental regulations and compliance requirements. Environmental impact assessments, permitting processes, and adherence to building codes contribute to the overall timeline.
Tip 5: Examine Weather Impact: Evaluate the influence of weather conditions on construction progress. Inclement weather can cause delays, particularly during foundation work and exterior construction phases.
Tip 6: Review the Transition from Shea Stadium: Acknowledge the interplay between the end of Shea Stadium’s operations and the construction of Citi Field. The coordination of these events influenced construction logistics and overall timelines.
Tip 7: Determine the Significance of the Opening Date: Emphasize the importance of the official opening date as a marker of completion. The date signifies not only the end of construction but also the start of operational use and revenue generation.
A comprehensive understanding of these aspects provides insights into the multiple factors influencing the stadium’s construction process.
The subsequent conclusion will summarize the key findings and underscore the value of analyzing the construction process.
Conclusion
The preceding analysis clarifies the answer to the question “when was citi field built.” The examination of construction commencement in 2006, the completion in 2009, and the significance of the stadium’s opening date are critical to understanding its origin. The influential roles of HOK Sport, the stadium’s location in Queens, New York, and a commitment to honoring Jackie Robinson’s legacy, shaped the project’s timeline.
Understanding the complexities involved in constructing a major sports venue provides essential insight into the intersection of design, engineering, and community. Further exploration of similar projects may reveal additional lessons in project management and urban development.
