The practice of tank crews foregoing the use of individual ballistic protection, commonly worn by infantry, stems from a confluence of factors related to the operational environment inside a tank and the nature of armored warfare. This decision, while seemingly counterintuitive given the inherent dangers of combat, is driven by practical considerations that prioritize crew effectiveness and survivability in specific ways.
The rationale for this choice is multifaceted. Space constraints within the confined interior of a tank are a primary concern. Body armor, while providing protection against small arms fire and fragmentation, significantly restricts movement and agility. This restricted mobility can impede the crew’s ability to rapidly operate complex equipment, respond to threats, and evacuate the vehicle in an emergency. Historically, tank design has focused on maximizing protection through the vehicle’s armor, rather than relying on individual protection for the crew. Furthermore, the added weight and bulk of body armor can contribute to crew fatigue during prolonged operations, potentially reducing their alertness and efficiency.
