The designation of the Ethiopian official in the Book of Acts as a eunuch raises immediate questions about his biological status and social role. A eunuch, historically, was a castrated male. However, the term also held a broader connotation, referring to men in positions of power within royal courts who, regardless of their physical condition, occupied administrative or religious roles requiring loyalty and often celibacy.
The individual’s position as a high-ranking court official of Candace, queen of Ethiopia, suggests several possibilities. He might have been a literal eunuch, castrated to ensure trustworthiness and prevent any dynastic ambitions. Castration was practiced in various cultures to create servants believed to be more dependable within royal households. Alternatively, the term could indicate his office, implying he was a trusted advisor or administrator without necessarily being physically altered. His role provided him with access to power and influence, indicating the importance placed on such individuals within the Ethiopian court. This official’s access to scripture also implies literacy and a level of education uncommon for the general populace, further demonstrating his elevated status.
