The absence of a major artist’s catalog from a leading music streaming service is a noteworthy situation. This absence, specifically concerning Garth Brooks and Spotify, reflects complexities beyond simple licensing agreements. It stems from a combination of artistic vision, business strategy, and control over intellectual property.
Refraining from Spotify access grants artists greater control over distribution and revenue streams. It allows for the prioritization of alternative platforms or exclusive deals, potentially offering more favorable financial terms or aligning with brand values. Historically, artists have withheld their music from certain services to preserve perceived artistic integrity or to protect the value of their catalog.
