The Churches of Christ practice a cappella singing in their worship services, meaning they do not use musical instruments. This practice stems from a specific interpretation of the New Testament scriptures. Advocates for this position assert that the New Testament authorizes singing (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16) but does not explicitly mention or command the use of instrumental music in worship. Consequently, they believe that limiting worship to a cappella singing adheres more closely to the practices of the early church.
This theological stance reflects a broader commitment to restoring the practices and beliefs of the first-century church. Proponents argue that adding elements not explicitly authorized in the New Testament introduces human innovations that deviate from God’s intended pattern for worship. This view emphasizes the importance of adhering strictly to the specific examples and commands found in scripture. Furthermore, the historical context of the Restoration Movement, from which the Churches of Christ emerged, underscores a desire to purify Christian practice by removing perceived accretions and returning to what was seen as the original, unadulterated form of worship.
Therefore, the absence of musical instruments in the worship services of the Churches of Christ represents a carefully considered theological position rooted in biblical interpretation, historical context, and a commitment to restoring what they believe to be the original form of Christian worship.
1. Scriptural Interpretation
Scriptural interpretation forms the bedrock of the Churches of Christ’s practice of a cappella worship. Their perspective on the absence of instrumental music in their services is inextricably linked to a specific method of interpreting the Bible, particularly the New Testament. This interpretative approach emphasizes a literal reading of the text and a reliance on explicit commands and examples.
-
New Testament Authority
Churches of Christ prioritize the New Testament as the sole rule of faith and practice for Christians. They believe that while the Old Testament provides historical context and foundational principles, the New Testament provides direct instructions for Christian worship and conduct. Consequently, they look to the New Testament to determine whether the use of instrumental music is authorized.
-
The Principle of Silence
A key aspect of their scriptural interpretation is the principle of “silence.” This principle asserts that if the New Testament is silent on a particular practice, it is not authorized for Christian worship. Since the New Testament provides specific examples of singing (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16) but lacks explicit commands or examples of using instruments in worship, Churches of Christ conclude that instrumental music is not sanctioned.
-
Explicit Commands and Examples
Their hermeneutic places a strong emphasis on explicit commands and approved examples found in scripture. If a practice is explicitly commanded or exemplified in the New Testament, it is considered authorized. Since the New Testament writers directed early Christians to sing, this is seen as an explicit command to engage in vocal praise. However, the absence of direct commands or clear examples of instrumental music leads them to exclude it from their worship.
-
Avoiding Additions
Churches of Christ believe that adding elements to worship that are not explicitly authorized in scripture represents a departure from the divinely ordained pattern. They view the introduction of instrumental music as a human addition that can potentially detract from the purity and simplicity of worship that they believe characterized the early church. This perspective reflects a desire to avoid what they perceive as innovations that could alter the essence of true worship.
Thus, the absence of instrumental music in Churches of Christ is a direct consequence of their approach to scriptural interpretation. By prioritizing the New Testament, adhering to the principle of silence, emphasizing explicit commands and examples, and seeking to avoid unauthorized additions, they believe they are faithfully following the pattern established by the early church and revealed in scripture. This interpretative framework is fundamental to understanding their distinct practice of a cappella worship.
2. New Testament Silence
The principle of “New Testament Silence” is a cornerstone of the Churches of Christ’s stance on the absence of instrumental music in worship. It posits that any practice not explicitly authorized in the New Testament is, by implication, prohibited. This principle dictates a strict adherence to what is perceived as the divinely ordained pattern for Christian worship.
-
Absence of Direct Command
The New Testament provides explicit commands regarding certain aspects of worship, such as singing psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. However, it contains no direct command to use instrumental music in worship. Advocates of the “New Testament Silence” principle interpret this absence as a deliberate omission, indicating that instruments are not part of God’s prescribed form of worship.
-
Lack of Approved Example
In addition to the absence of direct commands, the New Testament does not offer any clear examples of early Christians using musical instruments in their worship services. While instruments are mentioned in the Old Testament within the context of Jewish temple worship, the Churches of Christ emphasize that the New Testament establishes a new covenant with distinct practices. The lack of any approved examples in the New Testament is considered significant.
-
Implications for Worship Purity
The adherence to “New Testament Silence” is closely tied to the desire to maintain the purity of worship. Churches of Christ believe that introducing practices not explicitly authorized in scripture constitutes a human addition that deviates from God’s intended pattern. This perspective views the use of instruments as a potential corruption of worship, leading to a focus on entertainment or aesthetic appeal rather than genuine spiritual devotion.
-
Distinction from Old Testament Practice
Churches of Christ distinguish between the Old and New Testaments regarding worship practices. They acknowledge the use of instruments in the Old Testament temple worship but emphasize that the New Testament establishes a new and distinct form of worship centered on Jesus Christ. The transition from the Old Covenant to the New Covenant implies a change in worship practices, and the silence of the New Testament regarding instruments is seen as a deliberate shift away from their use.
In summary, the “New Testament Silence” principle is crucial to understanding the Churches of Christ’s perspective. The absence of direct commands and approved examples, coupled with the desire for worship purity and the distinction between Old and New Testament practices, collectively reinforce their conviction that instrumental music is not authorized for Christian worship. This conviction is not merely a matter of preference but a matter of obedience to what they believe is the clear and unambiguous teaching of scripture.
3. Restoration Movement
The Restoration Movement of the 19th century constitutes a foundational element in comprehending the Churches of Christ’s practice of a cappella worship. The movement, originating in the United States, sought to unify all Christians by returning to what its adherents believed were the original beliefs and practices of the first-century church. This desire to restore primitive Christianity directly influenced the Churches of Christ’s approach to worship, shaping their conviction regarding the exclusion of instrumental music.
The leaders of the Restoration Movement, such as Barton Stone and Alexander Campbell, emphasized the authority of scripture and advocated for practices explicitly found in the New Testament. Since the New Testament does not explicitly command or provide clear examples of instrumental music in Christian worship, they concluded that such instruments were not authorized. This interpretation, coupled with the movement’s broader aim of restoring original practices, led to the adoption of a cappella singing as the exclusive form of music in worship services. The absence of instrumental music, therefore, became a distinctive characteristic of the Churches of Christ, symbolizing their commitment to replicating the worship practices of the early church as they understood them.
Consequently, the Restoration Movement’s emphasis on scriptural authority and its pursuit of primitive Christianity are intrinsically linked to the Churches of Christ’s a cappella tradition. The rejection of instrumental music is not merely a matter of preference but a deliberate attempt to adhere to what they perceive as the divinely ordained pattern for worship, as evidenced by their understanding of the New Testament and their historical commitment to restoring the practices of the early church. This historical context is crucial to grasping the theological rationale behind this specific practice within the Churches of Christ.
4. A Cappella Tradition
The a cappella tradition within the Churches of Christ is not merely a stylistic preference but a deeply ingrained practice stemming directly from their theological understanding of worship and their historical roots. This tradition represents a tangible expression of their commitment to adhering to what they believe is the New Testament pattern for worship, specifically in the absence of instrumental music.
-
Theological Foundation
The a cappella tradition is rooted in the Churches of Christ’s interpretation of scripture, which emphasizes explicit commands and examples in the New Testament. Since the New Testament does not explicitly authorize the use of instruments in worship, the practice of singing without accompaniment is seen as a direct adherence to the scriptural pattern. This theological foundation dictates that the absence of instruments is not a matter of preference but of obedience.
-
Historical Continuity
The practice of a cappella singing is directly linked to the Restoration Movement of the 19th century. Early leaders of the movement, seeking to restore what they believed were the original practices of the first-century church, advocated for a cappella singing as the exclusive form of music in worship. This historical continuity reinforces the tradition as a key component of the Churches of Christ’s identity and their commitment to restoring primitive Christianity.
-
Emphasis on Vocal Participation
The a cappella tradition promotes congregational participation in worship. Without the presence of instruments, the focus shifts to the human voice, encouraging all members to actively engage in singing praises to God. This emphasis on vocal participation fosters a sense of unity and shared worship experience, reinforcing the communal aspect of religious practice.
-
Symbolic Significance
The absence of instruments in the a cappella tradition carries symbolic significance for the Churches of Christ. It represents a rejection of what they perceive as human innovations in worship and a commitment to simplicity and purity. By removing potential distractions or aesthetic embellishments, the focus is solely on the message of the songs and the act of praising God with the human voice.
In summary, the a cappella tradition within the Churches of Christ is a multifaceted practice deeply intertwined with their theological convictions, historical roots, and emphasis on congregational participation. It is not merely a stylistic choice but a fundamental expression of their commitment to adhering to what they believe is the New Testament pattern for worship, thereby explaining “why does church of christ not use instruments.” The tradition encapsulates their dedication to scriptural authority and their pursuit of restoring primitive Christianity in their worship practices.
5. Worship Purity
The concept of worship purity serves as a central tenet in understanding the Churches of Christ’s abstention from instrumental music. The conviction that worship should be conducted according to divinely ordained patterns, free from human innovation, directly informs the rejection of instruments. Instrumental accompaniment, perceived as an addition not explicitly authorized in the New Testament, is thus viewed as a potential contaminant to the purity of worship. This perspective arises from a desire to emulate the practices of the early church as closely as possible, believing that deviation from the scriptural model compromises the integrity of the worship experience. For example, introducing elements not found in the New Testament, such as elaborate ceremonies or instrumental performances, is considered to shift the focus from genuine spiritual devotion to external embellishments.
The emphasis on worship purity impacts several practical aspects of church life. The a cappella tradition necessitates a strong reliance on vocal participation from the congregation, fostering a sense of unity and shared responsibility in worship. Without instrumental music, the clarity and emphasis on the lyrical content of hymns and spiritual songs are heightened. This heightened focus promotes deeper engagement with the theological message and facilitates a more intimate connection with the divine. The pursuit of worship purity also influences the selection of hymns and the style of singing, prioritizing simplicity and reverence over elaborate musical arrangements. This emphasis extends beyond the music itself, shaping the overall atmosphere of worship to be one of solemnity, humility, and heartfelt devotion.
In conclusion, the unwavering commitment to worship purity is a driving force behind the Churches of Christ’s distinctive a cappella tradition. The absence of instrumental music is not simply a matter of preference or historical accident but a deliberate choice rooted in a deep theological conviction. While challenges may arise in maintaining this commitment in a contemporary context, the pursuit of worship purity remains a core principle that defines their identity and shapes their approach to religious practice.
6. Human Innovation
The concept of “human innovation” plays a significant role in the Churches of Christ’s rationale for abstaining from instrumental music in worship. Their perspective is rooted in the belief that any practice not explicitly authorized in the New Testament constitutes an unauthorized addition, potentially diluting the purity of worship.
-
Unauthorized Additions
Churches of Christ view the introduction of instrumental music as a form of human innovation that lacks scriptural warrant. Since the New Testament provides examples of singing but remains silent on the use of instruments in worship, they argue that instruments are an addition to the divinely ordained pattern. This perspective aligns with their broader aim of replicating the practices of the early church as faithfully as possible, avoiding what they perceive as deviations from the original model.
-
Potential for Distraction
Another concern related to human innovation is the potential for distraction from the primary focus of worship. The Churches of Christ emphasize that worship should center on God and the spiritual edification of the congregation. They suggest that instrumental music, while not inherently wrong, could shift the focus towards entertainment or aesthetic appeal, diverting attention from the core message of the gospel and the act of sincere praise. Therefore, limiting worship to a cappella singing is seen as a way to minimize potential distractions and maintain a focus on spiritual matters.
-
Erosion of Simplicity
The Churches of Christ value simplicity in worship, seeking to avoid elaborate rituals or practices that might obscure the essence of the Christian faith. The introduction of instrumental music is viewed as a step towards greater complexity, potentially eroding the simplicity that characterized early Christian worship. This concern stems from a desire to preserve the integrity of worship by adhering to the basic elements and practices explicitly mentioned in the New Testament, without unnecessary additions or embellishments.
-
Challenge to Scriptural Authority
Fundamentally, the Churches of Christ believe that introducing human innovations into worship challenges the authority of scripture. They emphasize that the New Testament provides sufficient guidance for Christian practice, and that adding elements not authorized therein implies that scripture is somehow incomplete or insufficient. The rejection of instrumental music, therefore, is ultimately a statement about their commitment to the supreme authority of scripture and their conviction that God has provided all the necessary instructions for acceptable worship.
These facets collectively illustrate the Churches of Christ’s concern regarding human innovation and its potential impact on worship. The absence of instrumental music is not merely a matter of preference but a deliberate choice rooted in a deep theological conviction. It is intended to preserve the purity, simplicity, and scriptural integrity of worship, aligning with their broader aim of restoring what they believe to be the practices of the early church.
7. First-Century Church
The Churches of Christ’s practice of a cappella worship is inextricably linked to their understanding of the first-century church. This period is viewed as the standard for Christian faith and practice, and the desire to emulate its worship style directly informs the exclusion of instrumental music. The perceived absence of instruments in first-century Christian worship services serves as a primary justification for their contemporary practice.
-
Absence of Explicit Scriptural Instruction
The Churches of Christ emphasize that the New Testament, while providing examples of singing, lacks explicit instruction regarding the use of instruments in worship within the first-century church. This perceived absence leads them to conclude that instruments were not part of the divinely ordained pattern of worship during that era. Thus, adherence to the New Testament account is understood as faithfulness to the first-century model. The absence of definitive archaeological evidence corroborating instrumental use further reinforces this perspective.
-
Simplicity and Accessibility
Proponents of a cappella worship often argue that the first-century church valued simplicity and accessibility in its worship practices. Given the social and economic conditions of the time, instruments may have been less readily available or practical for widespread use. The emphasis on congregational singing fostered participation from all members, regardless of their musical abilities or access to resources. This focus on simplicity and accessibility resonates with the Churches of Christ’s contemporary practice of prioritizing vocal participation over instrumental accompaniment.
-
Focus on Spiritual Substance
The Churches of Christ believe that first-century Christian worship emphasized spiritual substance over elaborate external displays. They suggest that the early church focused on the genuine expression of faith through prayer, teaching, and communal singing. The absence of instruments is seen as contributing to a worship atmosphere that is more conducive to introspection, spiritual reflection, and heartfelt connection with God. By forgoing instruments, the emphasis remains on the message of the songs and the sincerity of the worshippers.
-
Restorationist Theology
The Churches of Christ emerged from the Restoration Movement, which sought to restore the practices and beliefs of the first-century church. A core tenet of this movement was the belief that deviations from the original pattern had led to corruption and division within Christianity. The rejection of instrumental music is thus viewed as a necessary step in purifying worship and returning to the unadulterated form practiced by the early church. This restorationist theology reinforces the significance of the first-century church as the ultimate standard for contemporary Christian practice.
In conclusion, the Churches of Christ’s commitment to a cappella worship is deeply rooted in their understanding of the first-century church. By emphasizing the perceived absence of instruments, the value of simplicity, the focus on spiritual substance, and the principles of restorationist theology, they seek to emulate what they believe was the divinely ordained pattern for Christian worship during that era. This perspective underscores the historical and theological rationale behind their distinctive practice.
8. Theological Consistency
Theological consistency represents a crucial framework for understanding the Churches of Christ’s exclusive use of a cappella music in worship. The absence of instrumental accompaniment is not an isolated practice but rather a direct consequence of a broader system of beliefs and interpretative principles applied consistently across various aspects of faith and practice.
-
Consistent Hermeneutics
The Churches of Christ employ a specific hermeneutic, or method of interpreting scripture, across all areas of theology. This hermeneutic emphasizes explicit commands and approved examples found in the New Testament. Since the New Testament lacks explicit authorization for instrumental music in worship, its exclusion is the consistent application of this interpretative principle. Conversely, the presence of commands and examples for singing justifies the continued practice of a cappella music. Inconsistencies in applying this hermeneutic to other areas of faith would undermine the justification for this unique stance.
-
Rejection of Human Innovation Across the Board
The aversion to instrumental music stems from a broader principle of avoiding human innovations in worship that lack scriptural authority. This principle is applied consistently to other areas, such as rejecting practices or doctrines not explicitly found in the New Testament. For example, practices like infant baptism or the use of incense, not explicitly authorized in scripture, are similarly rejected. The prohibition of instrumental music aligns with this consistent rejection of any additions or alterations to what they believe is the divinely ordained pattern of worship.
-
Unified Application of Restoration Principles
The Churches of Christ emerged from the Restoration Movement, which sought to restore the practices of the first-century church. This restorationist impulse is not selectively applied but rather informs their approach to all aspects of Christian life. Just as they strive to replicate the worship style of the early church, they also seek to emulate its organizational structure, its teachings, and its ethical conduct. The a cappella tradition is thus part of a broader effort to adhere consistently to what they perceive as the original, unadulterated form of Christianity.
-
Maintaining Doctrinal Integrity
The prohibition of instrumental music serves as a marker of doctrinal integrity. For the Churches of Christ, upholding this tradition symbolizes their commitment to remaining faithful to their understanding of scripture and their historical roots. Any deviation from this practice would be seen as a compromise of their core beliefs and a departure from their distinctive identity. The consistent maintenance of this practice reinforces their commitment to doctrinal purity and their determination to avoid what they perceive as the corrupting influences of human innovation.
In summary, the Churches of Christ’s choice to abstain from instrumental music is intrinsically linked to their broader commitment to theological consistency. This principle manifests through consistent hermeneutics, the rejection of unauthorized innovations, the unified application of restoration principles, and the maintenance of doctrinal integrity. These interconnected facets demonstrate that the absence of instruments is not an isolated anomaly but rather a logical extension of a comprehensive system of beliefs and practices.
9. Pattern Theology
Pattern Theology, a central tenet within the Churches of Christ, provides the theological framework that directly informs the practice of exclusive a cappella singing in worship. This theological approach asserts that God established specific patterns or blueprints for various aspects of Christian life, particularly worship, and that faithfulness requires adherence to these divinely ordained patterns. The Churches of Christ believe these patterns are revealed in the New Testament, and that deviation from them constitutes a form of disobedience. The connection to “why does church of christ not use instruments” lies precisely in the interpretation of the New Testament as presenting a pattern of worship involving singing, but lacking explicit authorization or examples of instrumental music.
The application of Pattern Theology manifests in a meticulous examination of New Testament accounts to discern the specific elements of worship. For instance, the passages referencing singing (Ephesians 5:19, Colossians 3:16) are taken as direct commands or approved examples, establishing singing as a necessary component of Christian worship. Conversely, the absence of any explicit command or clear example of instrumental music is interpreted as a deliberate omission, signifying its exclusion from the divinely approved pattern. This hermeneutical approach extends to other aspects of church life, such as church organization, evangelism, and ethical conduct. Thus, instrumental music is not rejected arbitrarily, but rather as a consistent application of Pattern Theology across all areas of faith and practice. This also demonstrates its importance as a critical component of “why does church of christ not use instruments”.
Consequently, understanding Pattern Theology is essential to comprehending the Churches of Christ’s distinctive practice of a cappella worship. This theological framework provides the rationale for the exclusion of instrumental music, viewing it not as a matter of personal preference but as a matter of obedience to God’s revealed will. Challenges to this perspective often center on alternative interpretations of scripture and the potential for legalism. Nevertheless, the Churches of Christ maintain that adhering to the divinely ordained pattern, as they understand it, ensures faithfulness to God and preserves the purity of worship, directly tying back to “why does church of christ not use instruments.”
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the Churches of Christ’s distinctive practice of a cappella worship, providing informed responses based on their theological framework.
Question 1: Is the exclusion of instruments intended to be a judgment on other Christian denominations that use them?
The Churches of Christ maintain that the absence of instrumental music is primarily a matter of obedience to what they perceive as the scriptural pattern. While they believe their practice aligns more closely with the worship of the early church, the intention is not to pass judgment on the sincerity or validity of other Christian denominations’ worship styles. Their focus remains on adhering to their understanding of scriptural teaching and striving to worship God in accordance with that understanding.
Question 2: Does the Church of Christ believe instruments are inherently sinful?
The Churches of Christ do not typically assert that instruments are inherently sinful in themselves. The core of their conviction lies in the belief that the New Testament does not authorize their use in worship. This position stems from their interpretative framework, which emphasizes explicit commands and approved examples. Therefore, the issue is not the instrument itself, but rather its perceived lack of scriptural warrant within the context of Christian worship.
Question 3: Has the Church of Christ always abstained from instrumental music?
The practice of a cappella worship within the Churches of Christ is directly linked to the Restoration Movement of the 19th century. While instrumental music was prevalent in many Christian denominations at that time, leaders within the Restoration Movement advocated for a return to what they believed were the original practices of the first-century church. This commitment led to the adoption of a cappella singing as the exclusive form of music in worship, a practice that has continued to define the Churches of Christ since then.
Question 4: Does the absence of instruments mean the Church of Christ disapproves of musical talent or creativity?
The absence of instruments in worship services does not imply disapproval of musical talent or creativity. Rather, it reflects a specific understanding of how those talents should be expressed within the context of worship. The Churches of Christ value the human voice and encourage congregational participation in singing, recognizing that vocal talent can be used to glorify God and edify the church. Musical abilities may be expressed outside of the worship setting in various other appropriate ways.
Question 5: What is the Church of Christ’s response to arguments that the use of instruments enhances worship or appeals to a wider audience?
While acknowledging the potential benefits cited in such arguments, the Churches of Christ maintain that the ultimate standard for worship is not subjective preference or perceived effectiveness, but adherence to what they believe is the divinely ordained pattern revealed in scripture. They argue that focusing on pleasing God rather than appealing to human preferences ensures the integrity and purity of worship, even if it means potentially limiting the size or appeal of the congregation.
Question 6: Is there any flexibility or room for change in the Church of Christ regarding the use of instruments in worship?
The Churches of Christ’s stance on a cappella worship is deeply rooted in their theological convictions and historical identity. While there may be some variation in practice among individual congregations, the absence of instrumental music remains a defining characteristic of the Churches of Christ as a whole. Significant changes to this practice would require a fundamental shift in their hermeneutical approach and a reevaluation of their understanding of scriptural authority, something that is not generally anticipated.
These FAQs provide a summary of the Churches of Christ’s theological rationale for their practice of a cappella worship, emphasizing the importance of scriptural interpretation, historical context, and a commitment to worship purity.
Consider further exploration of resources related to the Restoration Movement for a deeper understanding of this perspective.
Understanding “Why does Church of Christ not use instruments”
This section provides insights for navigating discussions and research related to the Churches of Christ’s distinctive practice.
Tip 1: Prioritize Respectful Dialogue: When engaging in discussions about “why does Church of Christ not use instruments,” maintaining a respectful and understanding tone is crucial. Recognize that this practice stems from deeply held religious convictions.
Tip 2: Explore Primary Sources: Instead of relying solely on secondary interpretations, examine the Churches of Christ’s own writings and publications on the subject to gain a direct understanding of their reasoning.
Tip 3: Contextualize within the Restoration Movement: Recognize that the Churches of Christ’s a cappella tradition is closely tied to the historical context of the Restoration Movement and its emphasis on returning to perceived original Christian practices.
Tip 4: Understand Pattern Theology: Become familiar with the concept of Pattern Theology, which underpins the Churches of Christ’s belief in adhering to specific scriptural patterns for worship and church life.
Tip 5: Differentiate Between Doctrine and Preference: Recognize that the absence of instruments is a matter of doctrinal conviction for the Churches of Christ, not merely a stylistic preference.
Tip 6: Focus on Scriptural Interpretation: Acknowledge that differing interpretations of scripture are central to the debate. Understand the Churches of Christ’s hermeneutical approach and their emphasis on explicit commands and examples.
Tip 7: Avoid Generalizations: Be aware that while a cappella worship is characteristic of the Churches of Christ, there may be some variation in practice among individual congregations. Avoid making broad generalizations.
By applying these tips, individuals can engage with the topic of “why does Church of Christ not use instruments” in a more informed and sensitive manner.
Consider exploring further resources on the Churches of Christ and the Restoration Movement for a more in-depth understanding of this distinctive practice.
Why Does Church of Christ Not Use Instruments
The Churches of Christ’s abstention from instrumental music is a complex practice deeply rooted in scriptural interpretation, historical context, and theological convictions. This exploration has highlighted key aspects, including adherence to the principle of New Testament Silence, the influence of the Restoration Movement, the pursuit of worship purity, and the application of Pattern Theology. These elements coalesce to form a comprehensive rationale for the exclusive use of a cappella singing.
Understanding this distinctive practice requires engaging with the Churches of Christ’s unique hermeneutical approach and appreciating their commitment to restoring what they perceive as the original form of Christian worship. Continued scholarly investigation and respectful dialogue are essential for fostering a deeper appreciation of this tradition and its place within the broader landscape of Christian worship practices. The question of why instrumental music is absent serves as a window into the core tenets of the Churches of Christ faith and practice.
