The central question concerns the construction timeline of the Rhode Island farmhouse that gained notoriety through its association with paranormal investigations. This specific dwelling became widely recognized following the release of the film “The Conjuring,” which dramatized the experiences of the Perron family and the involvement of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren.
Understanding the origins of this structure provides crucial historical context. The building’s age, architectural style, and previous ownership can all contribute to a more complete understanding of its perceived significance. The structure predates the events depicted in the film by a considerable amount of time, having stood for many generations before the Perron family’s occupancy.
Documented records indicate the house’s construction dates back to approximately 1736. Since its construction, the property has changed hands numerous times, each successive owner contributing to the narrative and history associated with the site.
1. 1736
The year 1736 holds direct relevance to the question of when the farmhouse associated with “The Conjuring” was built. It represents the approximate year of the structure’s initial construction, according to historical records and property documentation. Understanding this date is crucial because it establishes the foundation for all subsequent narratives, both historical and paranormal, connected to the location. Without the established timeframe of 1736, placing events in a historical context becomes impossible, and the evaluation of claims becomes significantly more challenging.
The significance of 1736 extends beyond a mere date. The architectural style and building materials used at that time provide insight into the lives of the original inhabitants and the prevailing construction practices of colonial Rhode Island. Knowing the year of construction allows researchers to investigate land records, census data, and other historical documents from the 18th century, potentially revealing details about the builders, original owners, and early history of the property. For example, analysis of 18th-century Rhode Island building techniques could confirm or refute elements of the structures original design and construction.
In conclusion, 1736 is more than just a numerical answer to the question of “when was the conjuring house built.” It is the bedrock upon which the historical narrative of the property rests. While challenges may arise in confirming exact construction details due to the passage of time and limited documentation, acknowledging 1736 as the approximate date of origin provides a vital framework for understanding the houses past and evaluating its place within both historical and cultural contexts.
2. Construction Year
The specific construction year functions as the foundational element in ascertaining when the farmhouse linked to “The Conjuring” was erected. Without knowledge of the construction year, the chronological placement of the structure remains unknown. This knowledge impacts historical analyses, architectural evaluations, and contextual understanding of associated events. For example, without knowing the construction year, historians cannot effectively analyze the structure’s ownership history, demographic trends of the area during its early years, or impact of historical events upon the building and its occupants. The construction year serves as a vital marker for accurately placing the property within the broader historical timeline.
The construction year informs our understanding of the structures design and building methods. Examining the architectural style prevalent during the specific construction year facilitates analysis of the houses original appearance and subsequent modifications. In this case, knowing the 1736 approximate construction allows for analysis and identification of design influences that were contemporary and common at that time in the area. Further, it allows for comparison against later architectural modifications. Furthermore, the age of the building is a relevant factor when investigating claims of paranormal activity. It’s longevity and succession of owners adds layers of historical and potential psychological complexity to its narrative. Understanding the timeframe enables appropriate consideration of historical context in relation to reported events.
In summary, the construction year is more than a mere data point. It serves as a vital link to the historical narrative and allows for contextualization of the farmhouse within broader historical and cultural understandings. Precisely defining that construction timeline, even approximately as in this instance, is critical for investigations and a deeper insight in historical and cultural background.
3. Arnold Estate
The designation “Arnold Estate” is inextricably linked to determining when the farmhouse associated with “The Conjuring” was built. The property was historically a part of a larger landholding known as the Arnold Estate, and tracing its lineage within this estate provides critical clues to its construction and early history.
-
Original Land Grant
The Arnold family, prominent in early Rhode Island history, received significant land grants. Determining the specific grant that included the farmhouse property helps establish a possible earliest date of construction. For example, if the land grant occurred in the early 18th century, it logically follows that any structure on that land could not predate that grant. Researching historical land records and maps associated with the Arnold family is essential for this facet.
-
Property Divisions and Inheritance
Over time, the original Arnold Estate was likely divided and inherited by subsequent generations. Tracking these divisions and transfers of ownership provides a more granular timeline. Each transfer of ownership would be documented, potentially revealing details about improvements or existing structures on the land at the time of the transaction. For instance, a deed from the mid-18th century might describe a dwelling already present on the portion of the estate that includes the farmhouse property.
-
Tax Records and Census Data
Analyzing historical tax records and census data linked to the Arnold Estate can offer indirect evidence of the farmhouse’s existence. Tax assessments might list improvements to the property, including dwellings, which could be matched to the farmhouse. Similarly, census records could identify individuals residing on the land, suggesting the presence of a habitable structure. These records need to be cross-referenced with other historical documents to confirm their connection to the specific farmhouse in question.
-
Impact on Property History
The influence of the Arnold family on the land continued through generations, imprinting a lasting mark on Harrisville, Rhode Island, and the property. This historical weight affects later narratives and accounts linked to the farmhouse. The Arnold lineage and legacy adds to the property history, shaping future accounts. Understanding the Arnold Estate offers historical context that is necessary to consider when examining narratives around the home.
In conclusion, the “Arnold Estate” is not simply a geographical designation. It serves as a historical framework for understanding the origins of the farmhouse. Investigating the Arnold family’s land holdings, property divisions, and associated records provides essential information to pinpoint the construction timeframe and appreciate the historical context that surrounds it.
4. Harrisville, RI
Harrisville, Rhode Island, serves as the precise geographical location within which the farmhouse, popularized by “The Conjuring,” is situated. This locational context is essential for accurately determining the construction timeframe. Harrisville’s history, demographics, and available historical records directly influence the ability to research and pinpoint the approximate construction date. The town’s archives, land records, and local historical societies hold valuable information concerning property ownership, tax assessments, and architectural styles prevalent during the 18th century, all crucial elements in establishing the timeline of the structure.
The historical context of Harrisville provides critical insight. As a rural community with deep roots in early American settlement, the architectural styles and building practices of the time were influenced by the area’s available resources and cultural norms. Identifying typical construction methods used in Harrisville during the 1700s helps to confirm or refute assumptions about the farmhouse’s original design and building materials. Furthermore, Harrisville’s local historical society may possess specific documents or photographs that shed light on the property’s early ownership or appearance. The geographical location directly impacts our capacity to study the physical attributes of the structure, its historical trajectory, and narratives linked to it. Local knowledge and resources represent key elements in historical analysis.
In conclusion, the connection between Harrisville, RI, and the timeline surrounding construction cannot be overstated. The geographical location acts as a focal point, concentrating historical research and contextualizing information for a comprehensive assessment. Local history, archives, and the specific characteristics of the Harrisville environment must be considered when determining the approximate year of construction. Without factoring in the Harrisville context, establishing an accurate timeframe becomes significantly more challenging.
5. Pre-Perron Era
The “Pre-Perron Era” refers to the period preceding the occupancy of the Perron family in the farmhouse associated with “The Conjuring.” This timeframe is crucial for establishing an accurate construction timeline and understanding the historical context of the property before its association with paranormal claims. Focusing on the years prior to the Perron family’s arrival allows for a more objective investigation into the structure’s origins and subsequent evolution.
-
Ownership History
Tracing the ownership history before the Perron family’s occupancy is fundamental to determining the construction timeline. Land records, deeds, and historical documents detailing property transfers provide a chronological sequence of owners. Each transfer may contain descriptions of the property, including references to existing structures or improvements, thereby establishing a possible construction timeframe. For example, a deed from the 18th century describing a “dwelling house” on the property would indicate that the structure existed prior to that date.
-
Architectural Analysis
Analyzing the architectural style and construction techniques of the farmhouse, as it existed before the Perron era, helps determine when it was built. Identifying architectural features prevalent during certain periods allows historians to estimate a construction timeframe based on stylistic characteristics. Original building materials and construction methods may also be indicators of its age. An examination of the foundation, framing, and exterior details, compared with regional architectural trends, can offer substantial insights. For example, the use of specific types of wood framing or stone foundations might suggest a construction date within a defined period.
-
Historical Records and Census Data
Examining historical records and census data from the pre-Perron era offers further clues about the property’s history. Census records might identify individuals residing on the property, confirming the existence of a dwelling during specific time periods. Tax records might show assessments for buildings or improvements, which can provide insights into the properties development over time. These records, when cross-referenced with other sources, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the propertys evolution.
-
Local Historical Context
Understanding the broader historical context of Harrisville, RI, during the pre-Perron era is essential. This involves investigating the local economy, demographics, and significant historical events that may have influenced the construction and development of the area. Understanding the community helps clarify the conditions under which the farmhouse was built. Local historical societies and archives often hold valuable information, including maps, photographs, and anecdotal accounts that offer further insights.
By focusing on the “Pre-Perron Era,” researchers can establish a more factual and objective understanding of the farmhouses construction timeline, separate from the later associations with paranormal phenomena. This approach prioritizes verifiable historical evidence over anecdotal or sensational accounts, allowing for a more accurate assessment of “when the conjuring house was built.”
6. Multiple Owners
The succession of ownership associated with the farmhouse linked to “The Conjuring” is crucial in establishing its construction timeline. Each owner represents a potential period of modification, renovation, or documented interaction with the property, which, collectively, aids in piecing together the building’s history.
-
Deeds and Property Records
Deeds and property records serve as primary sources for tracing the chain of ownership. Each transfer of ownership is typically recorded, offering details such as the names of the buyer and seller, the date of the transaction, and a description of the property. These descriptions may include references to existing structures or improvements made during the previous owner’s tenure. Analysis of these records allows researchers to construct a chronological framework of ownership, providing valuable clues about when the structure was built and subsequently altered. Gaps in the chain of ownership may necessitate further investigation through alternative records such as probate documents or tax assessments.
-
Tax Assessments and Property Improvements
Tax assessment records often reflect property improvements, which can indirectly indicate construction activity. Increases in property values following a change in ownership may suggest that the new owner made significant alterations or additions to the existing structures. These records can also provide details about the size and type of buildings on the property, which can be cross-referenced with architectural analysis to establish a possible construction timeframe. Discrepancies between tax assessments and actual property conditions may warrant further scrutiny, as they could indicate unrecorded improvements or inaccuracies in the records.
-
Oral Histories and Local Accounts
Oral histories and local accounts, while often anecdotal, can provide supplementary information about past owners and their interactions with the property. Stories passed down through generations may offer insights into renovations, additions, or other alterations that may not be documented in official records. These accounts should be treated with caution and corroborated with other sources whenever possible. Local historical societies and community members may possess valuable knowledge about past owners and their contributions to the property’s history.
-
Architectural and Structural Modifications
Each owner may have implemented modifications to the original structure, thereby altering its appearance and impacting any architectural analysis. For example, a previous owner might have added a new wing to the house, changed the roofing material, or altered the fenestration. Examining these modifications helps to understand changes implemented over time, which may help determine time of construction. Careful observation and comparison of historical images, if available, with the current state of the structure, can help identify these changes. In addition, analysis of building materials used in different sections of the house can reveal periods of construction activity.
In conclusion, the sequence of ownership represents vital information when investigating the construction timeframe. Each owner leaves a footprint, in tangible records or structural modifications. Combining ownership history with other historical investigation methods and analysis helps build an accurate understanding of the property’s construction period.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries regarding the origins and construction timeframe of the farmhouse associated with “The Conjuring.”
Question 1: What is the approximate construction year of the farmhouse?
Historical records indicate that the farmhouse was constructed around 1736.
Question 2: Was the house built before the 18th century?
No, available evidence suggests construction began in the early to mid-18th century.
Question 3: Who originally owned the land on which the house was built?
The property was originally part of a larger landholding known as the Arnold Estate.
Question 4: Are there official records confirming the 1736 construction year?
While pinpointing the exact date is challenging, historical records and property documentation support the approximate construction year of 1736.
Question 5: Did the Perron family build the house?
No, the house existed long before the Perron family resided there. They were not involved in its construction.
Question 6: How does the construction year affect the properties historical significance?
The construction timeline helps provide chronological context for historical studies, architectural evaluations, and comprehension of associated events, both documented and anecdotal.
The 1736 date represents a critical foundation for historical exploration, allowing for a deeper analysis and contextualization of later occurrences.
The age and history of the property continue to generate considerable interest and research. Subsequent sections explore aspects related to its architecture and later ownership.
Tips for Researching the Farmhouse Construction Timeline
These recommendations provide guidance on conducting objective research into the origins and building history of the structure associated with “The Conjuring.”
Tip 1: Prioritize Primary Sources: Focus on accessing original documents such as deeds, tax records, and census data. These records offer direct evidence of property ownership, assessments, and occupancy, providing a verifiable foundation for establishing a timeline.
Tip 2: Consult Local Historical Societies: Engage with local historical societies and archives in Harrisville, Rhode Island. These institutions often possess unique knowledge, documents, photographs, and local accounts that may not be available elsewhere. Their expertise can provide valuable insights into the property’s past.
Tip 3: Analyze Architectural Styles and Building Materials: Study the architectural style and construction materials used in the farmhouse. Compare these features with known architectural trends and building practices prevalent in 18th-century Rhode Island. This can help confirm or refute assumptions about the construction year and identify subsequent modifications.
Tip 4: Cross-Reference Information: Verify information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and consistency. Compare data from deeds, tax records, census data, and oral histories to identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies that require further investigation. Corroborating evidence strengthens the reliability of research findings.
Tip 5: Maintain Objectivity: Separate factual information from anecdotal accounts or sensationalized narratives. While local lore and personal experiences may offer interesting perspectives, they should be treated with caution and subjected to rigorous scrutiny before being accepted as evidence.
Tip 6: Acknowledge Limitations: Recognize the limitations of available historical records. Some documents may be incomplete, damaged, or missing, making it difficult to reconstruct the complete history of the property. Acknowledge any uncertainties or gaps in the research findings, and avoid making definitive claims without sufficient evidence.
These tips encourage a methodical and objective approach to historical investigations, enabling a factual understanding of the construction narrative.
This understanding of the construction timeframe establishes a necessary framework for subsequent exploration and interpretation of associated events.
In Conclusion
The preceding analysis has focused on establishing a reliable timeline for the construction of the farmhouse associated with “The Conjuring.” Through examination of historical records, land ownership documentation, architectural styles, and local archives, a consensus emerges: the structure was likely erected around 1736. This timeframe predates the events dramatized in the film by a significant margin, offering a vital context for interpreting subsequent narratives linked to the property. The investigation highlights the importance of primary sources and cross-referencing data to substantiate any historical claim. A thorough analysis, considering multiple facets of historical record, strengthens the validity of the conclusions.
The determination of the approximate construction year, 1736, provides a foundation for continued historical investigation and provides a key date to interpret the many narratives associated with the property. Further research focused on specific owners of the house from 1736 forward may reveal additional information. Objectivity remains paramount when exploring narratives of historical properties. Solidifying our understanding of historical timelines builds a factual foundation.
