The inquiry concerns the commencement of wage replacement benefits within a workers’ compensation system. These benefits, designed to provide financial support to employees injured on the job, do not typically begin immediately following the injury. A waiting period, often mandated by state law, must elapse before payments commence. As an example, many jurisdictions require a worker to be out of work for a specified number of days, such as three or seven, before eligibility for lost wage compensation begins. If the disability extends beyond a certain duration, frequently fourteen or twenty-one days, the initial waiting period may be retroactively compensated.
Prompt provision of these benefits is critical for injured workers, as it alleviates financial hardship during periods of incapacity. Workers’ compensation systems, established to protect both employers and employees, aim to provide a predictable and relatively swift method of income replacement and medical care, reducing the need for litigation. The historical context reveals a movement away from the common law system, which often left injured workers without recourse due to complex legal hurdles and employer defenses. By establishing a no-fault system, these programs seek to ensure that injured employees receive necessary support without proving employer negligence.
Consequently, understanding the specific rules governing the timing of benefit payments within a given jurisdiction is paramount. Key factors determining the payment start date include the applicable state statute, the length of the waiting period, and the duration of the disability. Further exploration of these variables will provide a more complete understanding of the intricacies involved.
1. State-Specific Waiting Period
The “State-specific waiting period” is a critical determinant influencing the timing of workers’ compensation benefit payments. This period represents the initial number of days an employee must be out of work due to a work-related injury or illness before wage replacement benefits commence. The duration of this waiting period varies across jurisdictions, impacting when an injured worker can expect to receive financial assistance.
-
Impact on Initial Payment Delay
The waiting period directly delays the initial payment of workers’ compensation benefits. For example, if a state mandates a seven-day waiting period, an injured employee will not receive wage replacement for the first seven days of lost work time. This delay can create immediate financial strain for individuals unable to work and awaiting benefits.
-
Retroactive Payment Provisions
Many states offer retroactive payment provisions tied to the waiting period. If the employee’s disability extends beyond a certain length, often two or three weeks, the initial waiting period may be compensated retroactively. This provision mitigates the impact of the waiting period for more serious injuries resulting in longer periods of disability. However, it is not uniformly applied, varying significantly across states.
-
Variations in Duration Across States
The length of the waiting period is not standardized nationally. States establish their own durations, with some having no waiting period, while others have waiting periods of three, five, or seven days. These variations necessitate a thorough understanding of the specific regulations within the state where the injury occurred to accurately determine benefit eligibility and payment timelines.
-
Relationship to Medical Verification
The waiting period interacts with the timeline for medical verification of the injury or illness. While an employee might technically satisfy the waiting period based on time off work, payments may be delayed if medical documentation supporting the disability is not promptly submitted or approved. Therefore, timely medical verification is essential for initiating the payment process after the waiting period has elapsed.
In summary, the “State-specific waiting period” is a primary factor determining the initial timeline for benefit commencement. Its duration, the existence of retroactive payment provisions, and its interaction with medical verification processes collectively dictate when an injured employee can expect to receive workers’ compensation payments. The variability across states underscores the importance of consulting state-specific workers’ compensation laws to understand the precise rules governing payment timelines.
2. Date of the injury
The date on which an employee sustains a work-related injury or illness serves as the foundational reference point for determining the commencement of workers’ compensation payments. This date initiates the timeline for reporting the injury, seeking medical treatment, and ultimately, the eligibility and payment of benefits.
-
Triggering Event for Reporting Requirements
The date of the injury triggers the employer’s responsibility to report the incident to the workers’ compensation insurance carrier and any relevant state agencies. Failure to report within mandated timeframes can result in penalties and potentially delay the processing of the employee’s claim, subsequently affecting the payment start date. Timely reporting is crucial for establishing the validity and chronological context of the claim.
-
Establishing the Onset of Disability
The date of the injury is the starting point for assessing the duration of the employee’s disability. Medical evaluations and subsequent documentation refer back to this date to determine the extent of the injury, the necessary treatment plan, and the estimated return-to-work timeframe. These factors directly influence the eligibility and duration of wage replacement benefits, impacting when payments are scheduled to begin.
-
Impact on Waiting Period Applicability
The state-mandated waiting period, the initial period an employee must be out of work before receiving benefits, is calculated from the date of the injury. For instance, if a state has a three-day waiting period, those three days are counted from the injury date. Only after this period has elapsed can wage replacement benefits potentially commence, provided all other eligibility requirements are met. The accuracy of the injury date is, therefore, essential for calculating the waiting period correctly.
-
Relevance for Statute of Limitations
The date of the injury also establishes the starting point for the statute of limitations governing workers’ compensation claims. States impose deadlines within which an employee must file a claim. Failure to file within this timeframe, calculated from the date of the injury, can result in the denial of benefits, regardless of the severity of the injury or the validity of the claim. Thus, prompt action following the injury date is critical for preserving the right to receive compensation.
In conclusion, the date of the injury is not merely a historical detail but a critical anchor point in the workers’ compensation system. It sets in motion a series of events, from reporting requirements to the calculation of waiting periods and the determination of eligibility, all of which directly impact the timing of benefit payments. Understanding its significance is essential for both employees and employers navigating the complexities of workers’ compensation.
3. Medical verification timeline
The medical verification timeline significantly influences the initiation of workers’ compensation payments. This timeline encompasses the period required for an injured employee to receive medical evaluation, diagnosis, and subsequent documentation verifying the work-related nature and extent of the injury or illness. A protracted medical verification timeline invariably delays the commencement of benefits. For instance, an employee with a back injury who experiences delays in obtaining an MRI and specialist consultation may face a prolonged waiting period before the workers’ compensation insurer approves the claim and begins wage replacement payments. The insurer relies on this medical evidence to substantiate the claim and determine the appropriate level of benefits. Consequently, any impediment to the prompt acquisition of this evidence directly affects when the employee starts receiving financial support.
The speed and efficiency of the medical verification process are contingent on several factors, including the availability of medical appointments, the responsiveness of healthcare providers in providing medical reports, and the insurer’s own internal review processes. In cases where there is ambiguity regarding the cause of the injury, or if pre-existing conditions are present, the insurer may require additional medical examinations or independent medical evaluations (IMEs). These additional steps inevitably extend the medical verification timeline. For example, if an employee with a history of carpal tunnel syndrome develops similar symptoms after increased computer use at work, the insurer might mandate an IME to determine the extent to which the current symptoms are attributable to the workplace conditions versus the pre-existing condition. This requirement introduces additional delays and complexities to the overall claims process.
In conclusion, the medical verification timeline represents a critical pathway impacting when an injured worker begins receiving compensation. Delays in this process, stemming from factors such as appointment availability, provider responsiveness, or insurer-mandated IMEs, directly impede the timely initiation of benefits. Expediting this process through proactive communication between the employee, employer, healthcare providers, and insurer is paramount in minimizing financial hardship for injured workers and ensuring the effective functioning of the workers’ compensation system.
4. Employer reporting compliance
Employer reporting compliance is inextricably linked to the timeliness of workers’ compensation benefit commencement. The employer’s adherence to reporting regulations directly impacts the speed and efficiency with which an injured employee receives benefits. Delays or inaccuracies in employer reporting can significantly impede the entire claims process, postponing the date when wage replacement payments begin.
-
Timely Filing of First Report of Injury
Prompt submission of the First Report of Injury (FROI) is a fundamental employer responsibility. Most jurisdictions mandate that employers file this report within a specific timeframe, often within a few days of being notified of an employee’s work-related injury or illness. Failure to comply with these deadlines can result in penalties and delays in processing the employee’s claim. For example, if an employer neglects to file the FROI for two weeks after being notified of an employee’s injury, the insurance carrier may be unable to initiate the claim investigation and begin the process of authorizing medical treatment and wage replacement benefits. This delay directly postpones the date when the employee starts receiving payments.
-
Accuracy of Information Provided
The accuracy of the information provided in the FROI is as crucial as the timeliness of its filing. Incomplete or inaccurate information, such as an incorrect injury date, a misrepresentation of the employee’s job duties, or an omission of relevant details about the accident, can lead to claim denials or protracted investigations. These investigations can significantly delay the payment of benefits while the insurance carrier attempts to verify the information. For instance, if an employer provides an incorrect Social Security number for the injured employee, the insurance carrier may be unable to verify the employee’s wage history, delaying the calculation and payment of lost wages.
-
Cooperation with Insurance Carrier’s Investigation
Beyond filing the initial report, employers are often required to cooperate with the insurance carrier’s investigation of the claim. This cooperation may involve providing additional documentation, answering questions about the incident, and making relevant personnel available for interviews. A lack of cooperation from the employer can hinder the investigation and delay the determination of eligibility for benefits. For example, if an employer refuses to provide surveillance video footage of the accident scene to the insurance carrier, the carrier may be unable to fully assess the circumstances surrounding the injury, potentially delaying the decision to approve or deny the claim.
-
Adherence to State-Specific Reporting Requirements
Workers’ compensation reporting requirements vary significantly from state to state. Employers must be knowledgeable about and compliant with the specific regulations in the jurisdictions where they operate. Failure to adhere to these state-specific requirements can result in fines and delays in the processing of claims. For instance, some states require employers to provide specific information about their safety programs in the FROI, while others mandate that employers offer modified duty work to injured employees. Non-compliance with these requirements can lead to administrative delays and postpone the payment of benefits.
In summary, employer reporting compliance is a critical factor in determining when an injured worker starts receiving workers’ compensation payments. Timely, accurate, and cooperative reporting practices are essential for facilitating a smooth and efficient claims process. Conversely, non-compliance with reporting requirements can lead to significant delays and potentially jeopardize the injured employee’s access to benefits. The employer’s role in this process cannot be overstated, as their actions directly influence the timeline for benefit commencement.
5. Claim approval process
The claim approval process directly governs the timeline for the initiation of workers’ compensation payments. This process involves a comprehensive evaluation of the claim to determine its validity and eligibility for benefits. The duration and efficiency of this process are critical factors dictating when an injured worker can expect to receive wage replacement and medical benefits.
-
Initial Claim Review and Investigation
The initial phase of the claim approval process involves a thorough review and investigation by the workers’ compensation insurance carrier. This includes verifying the employment relationship, confirming the occurrence of a work-related injury or illness, and assessing the extent of the disability. For instance, if an employee files a claim for carpal tunnel syndrome, the insurer may investigate the employee’s job duties and work environment to determine if the condition is causally related to their employment. A prolonged investigation, due to incomplete information or conflicting accounts, invariably delays the claim approval process and the subsequent payment of benefits.
-
Medical Documentation Assessment
Medical documentation plays a pivotal role in the claim approval process. The insurance carrier relies on medical reports, diagnostic test results, and physician opinions to determine the nature and extent of the injury or illness, the necessary medical treatment, and the expected duration of disability. If the medical documentation is incomplete, inconsistent, or lacks sufficient detail, the insurer may request additional information or require the employee to undergo an independent medical examination (IME). These additional steps extend the claim approval timeline and postpone the commencement of benefits. For example, if the initial medical report lacks a clear diagnosis or fails to establish a causal link between the employee’s condition and their work activities, the insurer may deny the claim or request further medical evaluation.
-
Legal and Regulatory Compliance
The claim approval process must adhere to all applicable state laws and regulations governing workers’ compensation. This includes compliance with statutory deadlines for claim processing, adherence to benefit calculation formulas, and adherence to dispute resolution procedures. Non-compliance with these legal and regulatory requirements can lead to delays in the claim approval process and potential legal challenges. For instance, if an insurance carrier fails to provide the employee with timely notice of the claim determination, the employee may have grounds to appeal the decision, further delaying the payment of benefits.
-
Dispute Resolution and Appeals
In cases where the insurance carrier denies a claim, the employee has the right to dispute the decision and pursue an appeal. The dispute resolution process may involve mediation, arbitration, or formal legal proceedings. The length of the dispute resolution process can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case and the procedures established by the state workers’ compensation system. While the dispute is pending, the employee typically does not receive benefits, further exacerbating their financial hardship. For example, an employee whose claim is denied due to a pre-existing condition may choose to appeal the decision, leading to a protracted legal battle that delays the payment of benefits for months or even years.
In conclusion, the claim approval process is a critical determinant of the timeframe for the commencement of workers’ compensation payments. Factors such as the thoroughness of the initial claim review, the completeness of medical documentation, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the potential for disputes all influence the duration of this process. Expediting the claim approval process through proactive communication and efficient claims management is essential for ensuring that injured workers receive timely benefits and minimizing the financial impact of their work-related injuries or illnesses.
6. Benefit calculation method
The “benefit calculation method” directly affects the determination of “when workers comp start paying” by establishing the payment amount. While the date of eligibility and the waiting period dictate when payments can begin, the calculation method determines the actual monetary value of those payments. The process involves determining the employee’s average weekly wage (AWW) prior to the injury. State laws mandate specific formulas for calculating AWW, considering factors such as earnings history, overtime, and the number of hours worked. An accurate AWW calculation is crucial; errors in this step will directly impact the amount of the weekly benefit, which then influences financial stability for the injured worker and can lead to disputes that delay the onset of consistent payments. For example, a miscalculation of overtime pay in the AWW could result in a lower weekly benefit amount, potentially leading to an appeal by the employee, thereby delaying the payment start date. Furthermore, the specific calculation method might dictate the types of earnings included or excluded from the AWW, impacting the total benefit amount and potentially causing delays if these inclusions or exclusions are not clearly defined and applied from the outset.
Once the AWW is established, the workers’ compensation system typically pays a percentage of this wage often two-thirds as the weekly benefit. However, states usually impose maximum and minimum weekly benefit amounts. If the calculated benefit exceeds the maximum, the employee receives the maximum amount, regardless of their actual AWW. Conversely, if the calculated benefit falls below the minimum, the employee receives the minimum amount. These caps and floors can influence the timing of payments if the calculation requires adjustments due to state-mandated limits. For instance, if an initial calculation is performed incorrectly, exceeding the maximum benefit, a recalculation must occur, leading to administrative delays. Moreover, the method of accounting for concurrent employment where an employee holds multiple jobs also plays a significant role. States vary in how they handle earnings from secondary employment, and this determination influences the calculated benefit amount, impacting the commencement of full and accurate payments.
In summary, the “benefit calculation method” is an integral component of the “when workers comp start paying” determination. While eligibility and waiting periods establish the framework for payment initiation, the precise calculation method sets the monetary value and ensures compliance with state regulations. The accurate and timely application of the benefit calculation method is essential to prevent delays, avoid disputes, and ensure injured workers receive appropriate and timely financial support. Challenges can arise from complex earnings histories, state-imposed maximums and minimums, and variations in how concurrent employment is treated. A thorough understanding of the benefit calculation method within a specific jurisdiction is crucial for all stakeholders in the workers’ compensation system.
7. Payment frequency schedule
The “payment frequency schedule” directly influences the practical manifestation of “when does workers comp start paying”. While the initial eligibility and waiting period establish the earliest possible date for benefit commencement, the payment schedule determines the intervals at which those benefits are actually disbursed. A delay in establishing or adhering to a regular schedule effectively postpones the sustained financial support intended by the workers’ compensation system. For example, even if an employee’s claim is approved and the waiting period satisfied, benefits will not be realized until the insurance carrier implements a payment schedule. A bi-weekly payment schedule means the worker receives funds every two weeks following the initial payment, while a monthly schedule extends the period between payments, regardless of the urgency of the worker’s financial needs. The cause-and-effect relationship is clear: a delayed or infrequent payment schedule diminishes the timely benefit anticipated by the established “when does workers comp start paying” framework. The schedule is therefore a fundamental component ensuring ongoing support after the initial eligibility is determined.
State regulations often dictate acceptable payment frequency schedules, ranging from weekly to monthly disbursements. Insurance carriers must comply with these regulations, and any deviation can lead to penalties or legal action. Practical application of this understanding requires injured workers to be aware of the mandated schedule in their state and to proactively monitor their payments for adherence to that schedule. For instance, an employee in a state with a weekly payment requirement should expect to receive funds every week following the initial disbursement, and any missed or delayed payments should be immediately reported. Some insurance carriers may initially establish a manual payment process, which can be prone to errors and delays. Transitioning to an electronic payment system often streamlines the process and reduces the likelihood of disruptions. The practicality of this knowledge extends to employers, who must ensure their insurance carriers are compliant with payment frequency regulations to avoid potential liabilities.
In summary, the “payment frequency schedule” is a crucial determinant of the sustained financial support provided by workers’ compensation, directly impacting “when does workers comp start paying” in practice. While initial eligibility and waiting periods set the stage, the payment schedule dictates the intervals at which benefits are received. Challenges often arise from administrative errors, transitions in payment methods, or a lack of awareness of state-mandated schedules. A clear understanding of the payment frequency schedule, combined with proactive monitoring and communication, is essential for ensuring injured workers receive the timely and consistent financial support intended by the workers’ compensation system.
8. Retroactive payment rules
Retroactive payment rules within workers’ compensation systems significantly influence the practical interpretation of when an injured worker begins receiving benefits. These rules address the compensation for the initial waiting period, often a source of financial strain for newly injured employees. The provisions determine if and when this initial period is covered, thus impacting the overall timeliness and adequacy of compensation.
-
Eligibility Thresholds for Retroactivity
Retroactive payment hinges on meeting specific disability duration thresholds. Many jurisdictions stipulate that if an injury results in disability extending beyond a predetermined timeframe, such as 14 or 21 days, the initial waiting period becomes compensable. For instance, in a state with a 7-day waiting period and a 14-day retroactivity threshold, an employee disabled for 15 days would receive compensation for all 15 days, including the initial 7-day waiting period. Failure to meet the threshold results in the employee bearing the financial burden of the waiting period, directly affecting the overall benefit amount received and delaying full compensation.
-
State-Specific Variations in Application
The application of retroactive payment rules varies substantially across states. Some jurisdictions offer full retroactivity once the threshold is met, while others provide partial retroactivity or no retroactivity at all. This inconsistency necessitates a thorough understanding of the specific rules within the state where the injury occurred. Consider an employee in one state who is disabled for 20 days and receives compensation for all 20 days due to a full retroactivity provision. In contrast, a similarly situated employee in a state with no retroactivity would only receive compensation for 13 days, highlighting the significant impact of state-specific rules on the overall compensation timeline and amount.
-
Impact on Overall Benefit Adequacy
Retroactive payment rules directly impact the adequacy of workers’ compensation benefits, particularly for employees with longer-term disabilities. Covering the initial waiting period can provide crucial financial relief during a period when the employee is unable to work and may be facing significant medical expenses. Without retroactivity, employees are forced to absorb the financial impact of the initial waiting period, potentially leading to increased financial hardship and delayed medical treatment. This underscores the importance of retroactivity provisions in ensuring that benefits adequately address the financial needs of injured workers.
-
Administrative Implications for Claims Processing
Retroactive payment rules introduce administrative complexities into the claims processing system. Insurance carriers must accurately track the duration of disability to determine if the retroactivity threshold has been met and adjust payments accordingly. Errors in tracking disability duration can lead to incorrect benefit payments and potential disputes. Furthermore, clear communication with employees regarding retroactivity rules is essential to manage expectations and prevent misunderstandings. Efficient claims management systems and proactive communication are critical for effectively implementing retroactive payment rules and ensuring accurate and timely benefit delivery.
In conclusion, retroactive payment rules represent a significant facet of “when does workers comp start paying,” influencing both the timing and adequacy of benefits. The eligibility thresholds, state-specific variations, impact on overall benefit adequacy, and administrative implications underscore the importance of understanding these rules within the context of individual workers’ compensation claims. The practical effect of these rules can drastically alter the financial outcome for injured workers, highlighting the need for clear and consistent application.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries regarding the initiation of workers’ compensation payments. The information provided is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a qualified legal professional for guidance on specific situations.
Question 1: What is the typical timeframe for benefit payments to begin after a work-related injury?
The commencement of benefit payments is contingent upon several factors, including the state’s waiting period, the date of injury, medical verification, and employer reporting compliance. States generally impose a waiting period of a few days before benefits commence, though this is subject to retroactive payment provisions if the disability extends beyond a certain duration.
Question 2: How does the waiting period affect when payments start?
The waiting period is the initial number of days an employee must be out of work due to a work-related injury before wage replacement benefits begin. This period, mandated by state law, directly delays the initial payment. However, many states offer retroactive payment provisions, compensating for this initial period if the disability lasts beyond a specific duration.
Question 3: What role does medical documentation play in the payment timeline?
Medical documentation is crucial. Insurance carriers rely on medical reports, diagnostic test results, and physician opinions to determine the nature and extent of the injury, the necessary medical treatment, and the expected duration of disability. Delays in obtaining or providing this documentation can significantly delay the approval process and the subsequent payment of benefits.
Question 4: How does employer reporting impact the payment start date?
Employer reporting compliance is essential. Timely and accurate filing of the First Report of Injury (FROI) is a fundamental employer responsibility. Delays or inaccuracies in employer reporting can impede the claims process, postponing the date when wage replacement payments begin.
Question 5: What factors can delay the claim approval process and, consequently, the initiation of payments?
Several factors can delay the claim approval process, including incomplete or inconsistent medical documentation, disputes regarding the cause of the injury, delays in employer reporting, and the need for independent medical examinations (IMEs). Any of these factors can extend the timeline for benefit commencement.
Question 6: What steps can an injured worker take to expedite the payment process?
To expedite the payment process, an injured worker should promptly report the injury to the employer, seek timely medical treatment, ensure that all medical documentation is submitted to the insurance carrier, and maintain open communication with both the employer and the insurance carrier. Staying informed about state-specific workers’ compensation laws is also beneficial.
Understanding the interplay of these factors is essential for navigating the workers’ compensation system and anticipating the timeline for benefit commencement. Consult state-specific regulations and seek legal counsel for tailored advice.
Moving forward, consideration of potential disputes and appeals will further enhance comprehension of the benefit payment landscape.
Navigating Workers’ Compensation Payment Timelines
Understanding the intricacies of workers’ compensation payment timelines is crucial for ensuring injured employees receive timely financial support. The following tips offer guidance on navigating this process effectively.
Tip 1: Document the Injury and Report Promptly: Following a work-related injury, detailed documentation, including the date, time, and circumstances, should be created. Immediate reporting to the employer initiates the claims process and prevents potential delays arising from reporting violations.
Tip 2: Secure Timely Medical Evaluation: Seek medical attention promptly after the injury. Medical reports establishing the work-related nature of the injury and the extent of disability are fundamental to claim approval. Delays in medical evaluation can prolong the payment start date.
Tip 3: Understand State-Specific Waiting Period Rules: Familiarize oneself with the applicable waiting period rules in the state where the injury occurred. Knowing the length of the waiting period and any retroactive payment provisions is essential for anticipating when benefits will commence.
Tip 4: Monitor Employer Reporting Compliance: Confirm that the employer has filed the First Report of Injury (FROI) with the insurance carrier and relevant state agencies within the mandated timeframe. Follow up with the employer to ensure compliance and address any potential delays.
Tip 5: Maintain Open Communication with the Insurance Carrier: Establish and maintain clear communication with the insurance carrier. Respond promptly to any requests for information and proactively inquire about the status of the claim. Clear communication facilitates a smoother and more efficient claims process.
Tip 6: Understand the Benefit Calculation Method: Inquire about the method used to calculate the Average Weekly Wage (AWW) and the weekly benefit amount. Verifying the accuracy of the calculation ensures that the benefits received are appropriate and in accordance with state regulations.
Tip 7: Track Payment Frequency and Consistency: Track each payment to ensure it aligns with the state’s mandated payment schedule. This proactive step can prevent long term losses from payments being delayed.
Adhering to these tips can facilitate a more efficient workers’ compensation claims process, mitigating potential delays and ensuring injured employees receive timely financial support.
Having explored the practical guidance for navigating this system, consideration of potential disputes and appeals completes the overview of the benefit payment landscape.
Concluding Remarks on Benefit Commencement
This exploration of “when does workers comp start paying” has illuminated the multifaceted nature of this critical aspect of workers’ compensation systems. From the significance of state-specific waiting periods and the date of injury to the complexities of medical verification, employer reporting, and claim approval processes, numerous factors intertwine to determine the precise timeline for benefit initiation. The benefit calculation method and payment frequency schedule further define the practical realization of these timelines, while retroactive payment rules add another layer of complexity. Understanding these elements is essential for navigating the workers’ compensation system effectively.
The timeliness of workers’ compensation payments directly impacts the financial stability and well-being of injured employees. A thorough comprehension of the processes and regulations governing benefit commencement is paramount for all stakeholders. Continued vigilance and proactive engagement within the system are necessary to ensure that injured workers receive the support they are entitled to, mitigating the financial burden associated with work-related injuries and illnesses. Stakeholders should remain informed about evolving regulations and best practices to foster a fair and efficient workers’ compensation system.
